@Omar_The_OMAP I believe banks were issuing promiseary notes as far back in to the 1600s in europe

>in the US

Capital HAS nationality, the hardware of geography makes some places more prone to success then others, theft is more profitable then trade if you can get away with it, being richer allows you to get away with it.

This is a SHORT list of problems with laissez faire

that I have literally never heard anyone address to my satisfaction

both the confederates and the union issued their own notes

You know what we should be doing

Laughing at people that advocate for a "free market"

Because they're clearly stupid.

I'm unironically for a rather free market, but full on laissez faire is obvious bananas

It's meme tier

some markets in some fields can maybe be laissez faire, but not the entire economy

The involvement of the state is not only preferred, but is necessary in certain areas / ways

To ensure the consumer, environment or state isn't negatively effected

the problem is large companies use their market power to muscle out smaller competitors to maintain their monopoly/duopoly

that is one of the problems, yes

Hence the issue we have today.

google, to go back to that example, is an INCREDIBLE intelligence and general military asset. Allowing it to do whatever it wants is just madness.

**Nationalise it**

really, the US would be wise declare it a utility and to buy it out.

damn it, ninjaed me

there is a problem with that

Lower the voting age more for idiots, that doesn't understand politics...
| > Dem logic #101.
And people wonders why politics is so fucked.

~~~
Andrew Yang Wants to Lower Voting Age to 16
> https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/03/andrew-yang-wants-to-lower-voting-age-to-16/

a significant part of the long term value of Google is the fact that it is bleeding edge. State owned shit never is.

And just taking that hit is risky considering 🇨🇳

Depends on the way it's managed

Canadian Identity: Ending Official Multiculturalism and Preserving Canadian Values and Culture
> https://www.peoplespartyofcanada.ca/canadian_identity_ending_official_multiculturalism_and_preserving_canadian_values_and_culture

It could simply have its rules / TOS managed by a government entity

ye no, the free market ppl are correct in saying that state run shit is never as competitive with FEW exceptions

It could have some areas split off

rules TOS shure

but das not nationalization

So Alphabet can't own Youtube, Google, etc

das just legislation

It is, in a sense

You wouldn't be bringing all of it into public ownership

it's saying: this is what companies in this field can and cannot do

specifically: this is the only thing they are allowed to do with their TOS

Trump Executive Order Ending Social Media Censorship Has Tech Companies Outraged
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfuTP9CV4Tk

Tim "Trump good" Pool

It wouldn't be "legislation" per say.