Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 616250901333540864
Yeah but there's also kurds who are fighting back and not to badly if I'm correct
True, now they are were, with US support
Support which has now been withdrawn
Turkey has moved into kill them, as well as ISIS and Assad
*What remains of ISIS*
Here:
That was it
I'm weary about arming groups in the ME
You should be too tbh
I have far less reason to care about their refugees tho. As I can't really care for letting in every starving Africa villager.
Keep them where they are, support them there if you like and might will be right at the end of the day.
The issue is:
'Supporting them' can cause MORE issues. Which means MORE refugees
Which means more cowards lol
Well, it makes for a powerful political tool
Al-Qaeda was US backed.
Look what happened as a result of that.
Honestly in some respects I'm really coming round to the might is right argument.
If your not willing to be strong and defend your people and culture then it has no right to survive.
Well, enjoy an Islamic world then
I won't enjoy it because I'd rather be dead
I have every right if I fight and win. The dead and coward has no rights.
Your culture won't win though tbh
Islamic culture is much stronger, unified and determined than Western culture
Yeah because to them might is right and so should ours.
If we don't fight then we either run or die. And running is a cowards victory and one that is worthless and parasitic as I've explained.
If life as a slave is better than death then don't let me get in your way of golden chains.
Running is a valid tactic if fighting is an inferior move
Running is a valid tactic if fighting is an inferior move
In fact many wars have been won by those willing to run in the right circumstances
and in the right direction
This isn't refugees tho is it
Well
Refugees have all sorts of backgrounds, but the issue is most aren't refugees
Actual refugees are thankful for asylum and the fact they can survive with a chance of building a future for themselves in their host country
If that is neccessary
Yeah and my original point is a host nation should have no reason to take refugees because in no way can you properly trust them.
Because they're cowards. They ran from conflict instead of fighting alongside their fellow countrymen.
It's not to say it's not beneficial to refugees, and hell it might be beneficial to their countrymen who stayed behind but in no way is it beneficial to those they seem asylum from.
Are you gonna argue that European war refugees have betrayed the US?
You're making two arguments, one is that they betray their home country, two that they can't be trusted by their host country
These are pretty wild allegations, I want to see sources for that
The former I guess is more of a moral argument, but the latter is objective
most of those who claim to be refugee's are just niggers trying to leech off of the system