No that's not my argument

@TEABAG!!! wants straight up Christian authoritarianism installed

Well in the USA right now you cannot become president without calling yourself christian

That's part of the dogma working

That's true actually

@Lios Can you give me chapter and verse on that? I've literally never seen it come up in the last 16 years of elections.

But that's rather proof that atheists are more tolerant of Christians, than Christians are tolerant of atheists

@ETBrooD Bullshit!

That hurts, right?

Every single attempted nominee who dared to call themselves anything other than a sect of Christianity has gone absolutely horribly in the polls, regardless of their promises and ideals

Christians are more tolerant of atheists, because they failed to suppress the rebellion, because they wanted to be more subjugative by passive law, rather than oppressive force.

See Islam

Not much atheism there

Most atheists are agnostic, so no

They're by far more tolerant

Semantics.

You brought it up, man

If you think that's semantics that just proves to me you don't know much about atheism

You don't say "Jesus may not have been magic" you say "Jesus don't real."

Yeah, Jesus wasn't real

You outright deny history,

No, I deny a story

You deny the ROman Empire.

I don't

I think Jesus might have been real, but was just either a scapegoat or -as is historical- a martyr, blown way beyond proportion.

Not that it matters, Christians clearly don't give a fuck about Jesus

??

Jesus is the center of Christianity, right after God

You might as well say Richard Dawkins isn't real, because his books are bullshit too

Supposedly

Not supposedly

But they do not follow any of his action or teaching

And if I don't agree with someone's books being factual that means they aren't real

They simply follow a new testament of god, written after Jesus

Of course they don't follow his actions or teachings

A lot of which was quite anti-Jesus

They're human

And everyone at Oxford who says they know Dawkins is a liar

The principles of Christianity became the most successful in the world, so, wether or not Jesus' stories in the bible are utterly accurate or not, they did do the job of spreading like a wildfire. Presumably because they satisified a need or two in the inception.

Because you can just make up stuff like that can't you?

Well who wouldn't support a godly figure who came down and - in his story - taught humans to just respect and provide for each other, and not cast judgement lightly?