Message from @SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck
Discord ID: 614141766664192032
also wouldnt proposing the banning of weapons be protects by the 1st ammendment?
protected*
@Uksio
>have you seen the mass stabbings in Japan
>a country with considerably fewer guns than most countries
Fun fact: open carry of swords was never taken off the books in Germany
OOF
Yet kniffes are banned
***BRUH***
So I can carry a sheathed sword, but not a knife, lol
>gangs of roaming samurai who walk the streets, stopping Islamic terrorism
McNukes now, gov’t fails where communities and businesses thrive
Governments are all gonna be replaced by corporations eventually anyway
what? when communities and businesses thrive... the goverment makes more taxes... and also thrives...
and i dont mean more taxes as in increase tax or new taxes.. i mean simply more income from existing taxes
Jokes on you, communities aren't thriving in South Sudan, and the govt. is pretty much nonexistant
Businesses also aren't thriving there
fucking checkmate
Isnt sudan in africa?
does your logic only apply to specific hemispheres?
@Bones Yes it is. How does that change the outcome?
or chief CIA operative
Niggers are stupid, dont have knack for civilized society and are behind white development by a couple hundred years still
So it only applies to certain hemispheres
Neat.
Not necassarilly, if u moved all the people around in a switcharoo it would change
Liberia's only behind Western Civ (let's be real, it's not that far behind Russia in anything but Nukes) by like...2-4 decades, because of the infighting
and they're still fighting a civil war IIRC
bones - do you believe that development or progress follows a linear time pattern?
Without outside intervention, africa would still be iron age likely
<:Doubt:588038713938804760>
like.. if america is 100 years more advanced than poland... it will take poland 100 years to catch up?
China kinda disproves that
IIRC
No of course not
africa could catch up in development in the next 20 years :/
<:Doubt:588038713938804760>