Depends on the type of slavery really, voluntary servitude to pay off debt or crime wouldn't be the worst

I know some ancaps are larpy edgibois and like to play into the strawman meme for chuckles, and it can be difficult to know what people actually believe without context or tone

Even though
Like
Inherent self-ownership is a fundamental concept in ancap theory that I know of

TBH I disregard the idea of any silly poitical view being seriously held by anyone unless it's directly associated with someone using their actual identity. Otherwise it's probably a troll.

Voluntary servitude

There seem to be two general camps on this. One is that self-ownershop is non-transferable under any condition, and one that you can still *lease* out your services under contractual obligation, which could be argued to be equivalent to slavery in function, but would require that the contract is entered voluntarily at some point.

This is trade, not slavery

Historians would disagree

essentially, it's "slavery" after the same fashion as employment is "slavery"

Ancient Aztecs had this form of Slavery @Nevis

Perhaps define servitude as you mean it here

but the circumstance and conditions of it can be expanded to be pretty bad, depending on what's acceptable for terms of contract

To be certain we are referring to the same exact thing

Voluntarily becoming a slave for someone to fulfil a task for X amount of time to pay something off

@Gservator I'm speaking specifically of ancap philosophy on self-ownership, not broad historical opinions

@Miniature Menace I'm not talking to you

@Gservator "Historians would disagree"

This is not you talking to me then? Okay.

https://tenor.com/view/vietnam-cats-flashback-gif-10819307

Yeah, I am certain there is a point of promised service where it crosses the line of trade to what amounts to slavery
Way too tired to really consider the nuance of where that is right now, though

In the Aztec empire if you didn't pay off the debt you became a sacrifice

So, historians would disagree with voluntary servitude being excluded from slavery?

Yes

I was mostly remarking upon that the accusation that the libertarian-right is okay with slavery or some shit is apparently not such a baseless accusation as I thought
Even if inaccurate, there is reasonable basis to think that if those are the ones that they have seen

Granted, I consider myself neutral/indifferent to the liberal/conservative axis

Well, first, I get the impression that there would likely already be a factor of duress, for someone to take this deal. And second, that's just an employment contract with your body as collateral.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Beans were the currency in the Aztec empire

http://www.quickmeme.com/img/5c/5c58e4dfec37d894863f89d15c197eedbedf6b48b6b6ddda243ae9bab137f871.jpg

So in mexico you are worth a number of beans

Human beangs

*Real* human beans

Boo

*human **beans***

I think the thing I liked about Aztecs is the fact that sacrifices weren't killed immediately, they spent a month in a chamber to partake in drugs and sex being treated as a celebrity and then got sacrificed

Which ones chiefly sacrificed war prisoners?

What you mean

Like, of the south/central american tribes

All of them depending on era

Mayas, Incans, Aztecs
Idk which one

Okay

Probably what he said