Message from @svarozhyc

Discord ID: 614028189097918464


2019-08-22 09:24:49 UTC  

Careful jack are you threatening people on the internet

2019-08-22 09:25:07 UTC  

There needs to be a bar and standards for laws so they don't come out as retarded as the coms act which I understand is old

2019-08-22 09:25:08 UTC  

luckily theres still some stuff to do here

2019-08-22 09:25:28 UTC  

causing offense and nuisance was the fav pastime of mine since there was literally nothing esle to do

2019-08-22 09:25:38 UTC  

There's supposed to be a writing team who make the laws legalese

2019-08-22 09:25:47 UTC  

But the coms act is just so bad

2019-08-22 09:26:04 UTC  

The problem is not that someone does determine what is relevant context. The problem is that your judiciary is CLEARLY politically motivated in its verdicts, thus anything and everything that is against their political preference is illegal (or legal) depending on who you are. The problem isn't that the law is bad (even though it might be), the problem is that the law does not matter at this point.

2019-08-22 09:26:13 UTC  

thats why the notion of keeping legalese in simple english is retarded

2019-08-22 09:26:28 UTC  

But it does because they used that law to prosecute

2019-08-22 09:27:05 UTC  

so ban guns because of shootings 😂

2019-08-22 09:27:10 UTC  

- Jack 2019

2019-08-22 09:27:12 UTC  

😛

2019-08-22 09:27:36 UTC  

There desire to ban guns has nothing to do with if there are shootings tbh

2019-08-22 09:27:44 UTC  

obv

2019-08-22 09:27:54 UTC  

but its the shit ppl swallow

2019-08-22 09:27:59 UTC  

they buy it some of em

2019-08-22 09:28:00 UTC  

Though we are moving into a more dangerous and polarised age

2019-08-22 09:28:01 UTC  

A law against wearing red clothes is dumb, but it's ez to avoid getting prosecuted for it. A legal system that says you were wearing red clothes, even though you weren't, because you are politically annoying to the establishment is *impossible* to avoid.

2019-08-22 09:28:02 UTC  

you know the voters

2019-08-22 09:28:25 UTC  

And there is going to be a steeper increase in attacks then the dozen or so shitty failed ones we've seen in like the last 2ish months

2019-08-22 09:28:48 UTC  

i mean...

2019-08-22 09:29:03 UTC  

no matter watchu gonna do ppl will kill each other occasionally en masse

2019-08-22 09:29:18 UTC  

exactly

2019-08-22 09:29:24 UTC  

we should just accept it

2019-08-22 09:29:25 UTC  

There desire to kill dozens comes before building the first bomb or buying the first gun

2019-08-22 09:29:28 UTC  

and join in on the slaughter

2019-08-22 09:29:33 UTC  

precisely

2019-08-22 09:29:38 UTC  

🍿

2019-08-22 09:29:38 UTC  

Imao

2019-08-22 09:30:08 UTC  

yes sam you address it before the acquisition of means

2019-08-22 09:30:27 UTC  

at the point of acquisition theres no stopping other than jailin or shit

2019-08-22 09:30:30 UTC  

All mass shooter don't have GFs ban access of firearms to people who haven't had a GF no more mass shootings

2019-08-22 09:30:33 UTC  

too far gone

2019-08-22 09:30:54 UTC  

There is the idea that if you go on a mass killing spree you are punished and that's that

2019-08-22 09:31:03 UTC  

Why being up banning guns, murder is already illegal imao

2019-08-22 09:31:05 UTC  

"No guns for virgins!" is a political slogan I can stand by tbh

2019-08-22 09:31:11 UTC  

lol

2019-08-22 09:31:21 UTC  

how are they gonna lose virginity tho?

2019-08-22 09:31:27 UTC  

I'm still working on the idea but something like that could very easily work

2019-08-22 09:31:28 UTC  

without a gun to put to someones head

2019-08-22 09:31:29 UTC  

smh