Britlaw is written by like 5 people, which is why it can be retarded sometimes

As evidenced by "context doesn't matter"

A judge should never fucking say that

That's because the communications act is retarded

You are being retarded

Blessed be Tony Blair

I don't think it was the law I think it was the judge

the problem is not that the judge decides what is and isn't context

Also Blair is the devil

that is normal and necessary

*someone* has to decide that

now i will have to beat my folks to send the applications too *sigh*

You could argue that the law says context doesn't matter no N words allowed

You’d think the UK would have some commission or board that would look into outdated laws

Idk if it actually does though

Maybe laws should expire after a certain amount of time

its more retarded innit

The communications act is so vague you could prosecute anyone for anything on the internet with it

'causing offence'

causing offence and nuisance is illegal in the uk - fact

Careful jack are you threatening people on the internet

There needs to be a bar and standards for laws so they don't come out as retarded as the coms act which I understand is old

luckily theres still some stuff to do here

causing offense and nuisance was the fav pastime of mine since there was literally nothing esle to do

There's supposed to be a writing team who make the laws legalese

But the coms act is just so bad

The problem is not that someone does determine what is relevant context. The problem is that your judiciary is CLEARLY politically motivated in its verdicts, thus anything and everything that is against their political preference is illegal (or legal) depending on who you are. The problem isn't that the law is bad (even though it might be), the problem is that the law does not matter at this point.

thats why the notion of keeping legalese in simple english is retarded

But it does because they used that law to prosecute

so ban guns because of shootings 😂

- Jack 2019

😛

There desire to ban guns has nothing to do with if there are shootings tbh

obv

but its the shit ppl swallow

they buy it some of em

Though we are moving into a more dangerous and polarised age

A law against wearing red clothes is dumb, but it's ez to avoid getting prosecuted for it. A legal system that says you were wearing red clothes, even though you weren't, because you are politically annoying to the establishment is *impossible* to avoid.

you know the voters

And there is going to be a steeper increase in attacks then the dozen or so shitty failed ones we've seen in like the last 2ish months

i mean...