Liberalism.

<:coolgon:549370575701803019>

@BabaBooey That's a Mao Zedong quote, you retard. Taylor Swift didn't say that.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/ch05.htm

Honestly the term is more adequately defined by the aggressor

Let's say Germany invades Holland.
Then shuts all its borders, then kills every single dutchman. 17 million people dead.
Then, German peoples come in, destroy any proof of existence of the Dutch. Culture, art, architecture, anything.
And proceed to build their own culture on dutch ground.

As if the dutch never existed.

How that would be described as a declaration would be simply a "war of extermination"
Perspective from any side defines it as something else

The Germans might call it "cleansing"
Others would call it genocide, but that is quite a literal term, as that is certainly what occurs

probably some new term like "Erasure" would fit well

centrists

Yeah, entirely depends on perspective and imagination in that sense. Hell what if Poland was in support and called it "purification" of Holland.

"We should ban the opinions of people we disagree with because our opinions don't hold up to theirs"
--Extremists

But the declaration term would be a war of extermination.

lol if were gonna get that post-modern about it it kind of removes meaning from all words

Always gonna have opposition, but the future always has words for history.

it probably would just end up being genocide if an honest take is done

>Micro-Portions

speak for yourself, I can get a filling meal for a dollar at a Dollar Store

The genocide would be the act of killing the people, but you don't need a war to commit genocide.

See: Soviet Union

sounds like a war crime

a massive series of them

@Lios THAT'S NOT REAL COMMUNISM, REMEMBER

Well, to be fair. It wasn't. It's just that communism doesn't really last long...

id still say it fits genocide

And it probably never can, unless we were to permit an artificial intelligence to become our overlord

not even

at best, it'll only work for robots

id argue that consisting of a hive mind doesnt constitute communism

like mushrooms arent communists

<:hyperthink:462282519883284480> or are they

An AI might be able to think fast enough to solve the greater issues and balance the situation, but that's purely hypothetical. I agree it's not even likely.

well its not about solving its about removing the human equation entirely

A hivemind is the end-goal of communism.

so you need something like the matrix

Virtually unreachable, but the basic idea

anarchy is the end state of communism lol

Anarchy is the end-state of anything we've made so far.