Actually

Post modernism is so against what is obviously true that I don't get why people fall for it

Oopsie doopsie

Do you think we could make Post modernists become the worlds largest Jamestown

all of philosophy essential hinges on what a person defines their axioms for truth to be

Good mornyan everynyan! Most new ideas are simply old ones

If we just make them all think being alive isnt real

And make them kill themselves

They don't even follow that part

They just go

the meta game of philosophy is essentially how do we determine those axioms

What is real is what I want it to be

yeah thats the post modern conclusion

**Reality can be whatever I want it to be** imao

more or less

And thus the female penis was born

but yeah the (good) nihilists would simply argue that there is no method for determining a "correct" axiom of truth without also being dependent on some presupposition

and so all are false

however that doesnt mean you can go forwards from that point and artificially utilize certain axioms for pragmatic reasons

Im facing a wave of FBPE tards

the goal being that you just want to knowingly satisfy your brains chemistry by acting pragmatically

purely as its own self fulfilling goal

cos I said it was democracy that the government would uphold the vote of the people.. i.e. demos kratos (greek: people power)

so basically the only good nihilist is one that keeps it in the meta-physics space

We the people <:comfort:592107824826417204>

As opposed to what wacka

anyway thats enough autism for me lmao

Time for English civil war version 2

No ta

Time to barricade the Greggs

The reason they end up at the reality is whatever I want point is because its ultimately impossible to act out nothing being true

time for people to understand philosophy and start buildign their fucking societies correctly

I think that'd make it worse but I could be wrong

its an autistic solution to the faulty-axioms problem

they are just using their own feelings to justify whatever they want

because they are children

but that is the probelm, technically they arent incorrect

because its an unfalsifiable hypothesis

I don't even think its a conscious decision I think they just default to that the moment they are faced with a error