otherwise, ANYONE starts to sniff their own farts

And the best way to do it is to experience things and apply rational thought (if not a full scientific method) to the experienced phenomenon

Exept for feels

Feels are something irrational from the start

if you CAN know, think; if there are too many variables, use your judgement

You don't decide on what car to buy via impulse. Similarly, you don't use a checklist to decide what career to pursue or who to marry

are any of you of the understanding that we really are in a simulation though , whether generated by space tortoise or Ai?

based on quantum theory/mechanics?

fake news from sub-par scientists

how so?

the idea is based on the nature of the universe and that "information'' or an impression remains even it the matter or energy is removed or destroyed

someones base maybe

trouble is that it's instance of not remembering what they terms in the math represent

quantum theory illlustrates particle wave duality

a cloud now illustrates electrons

an particles position and velocity can't be known at the same time because the act of measuring the particle changes the measurement

and the math shows that the particle 'blinks in and out of existance'

so that we can only predict the region in which it occurs

and thats what you are basing your defence of materialistic dogma?

no, i haven't gotten to that point yet

But won't that discombobulate the Flux capacitors?

that is just the primer

physical particles blinking in and out of existence?

just the primer...

fuck i thought it was cut and dry but i never talked to godman<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

God is dead because allah killed him.

the problem is that the fundamental nature of the universe is unknown and what we can observe has limits; think of it this way, a 'universe' is a conceptualization as it cannot be observed in it's entirety

Germany after gassing all the Jews: “oh he clean though”

The only thing we can be sure of is that existence is real.

being a concept, a representation, any universe conceptualized must by it's nature SUPPORT a being capable of conceptualization

Everything else is a subjective view

yeah but are you confusing the model with whats being modelled?

as one cannot know what is 'outside' that sphere, it's lcircular reasoning

it's more like the interpretations of the equations and what they mean

We can assume another person shares the same subjective view as us so we can assume that when we talk about reality we are talking about the same thing.

for example, does Time really exist or is it just a 3d refernce frame?

but they are using what they have discovered works ... and they are modelling what IS happening outside the sphere of reality

It’s only when you get into philosophy that you can’t assume a shared worldview.

the math says there are at least 7 dimensions

My head hurts from all the structural alluminium alloy properties