Section 230 doesn't say how their website / algorithm should be ran.

For real the only thing I've used facebook for in the last two years is having a cheeky wank

sounds fun

@stathelle i have guns and don't rely on it

It doesn't say that political agendas need to be shown equally

removing 230 will only remove the restriction on suing people that host 3rd party material

let's post shit to get facebook sued out of business

pretty soon i will be growing my own food

@Weez it does though, it says that they are public platforms, when they arent. they are violating the spirit of the exemption

no 230 = standing to sue

@dichloroarsine I just would feel a lot more secure about degenerating society if I had a gun

twitter is not a public platform if they remove people for deadnaming someone

buy some then

They are public platforms in the context of anyone being able to join and say whatever they like within the rules.

@dichloroarsine uh, gotta wait if you know what I mean

damb

their rules are politically based which is part of the issue

Their rules are not politically based.

by what standards is twitter a public platform?

they are dude

@dichloroarsine Hopefully it won't be too long so that I will still be able to obtain one

You just don't like them.

i have friends with enough guns to arm a small town, and pretty soon i'll be acquiring some land and growing my own food

fuck their rules I only obey my nation's laws

Sounds communist @dichloroarsine

@Weez exactly

the idea of deadnaming someone being a bannable offense is a left leaning ideological rule

@Weez They are given leeway through laws that allowed them to be free of liability specifically because they were advertised as free platforms.

Oh no, I can't say Nigger on Facebook anymore 😢 😢 😢 😢 😢

What will you name your new commune?

A boon not given to a lot of other places.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/22/world/asia/twitter-agrees-to-block-blasphemous-tweets-in-pakistan.html
>When you block tweets because the feelings of some sandniggers get hurt

@Weez communism works on really small scales, obviously (only if you trust those who you're living with)

a software application running on awebservices is the property of those with license of ownership of the phsycial hardware

@UnScottable no it isn't lmao, censorship based on identity is right wing no matter what the identity is

<:thunk:462282216467333140>

you wot?

It isn't right wing. It is human.

no not at all. right wingers want freedom of speech wtf are you talking about

western "leftists" (neoliberal socdems who are in reality right wing) do not represent leftism at all

So Facebook are the real fascist eh