Message from @Weez

Discord ID: 617521398713286689


2019-09-01 00:47:58 UTC  

Simple.

2019-09-01 00:48:03 UTC  

@UnScottable no need to do ad homenim attacks

2019-09-01 00:48:07 UTC  

" A platform is not responsible (legal) for the content that is posted. Publisher: a company or person that qurates and distributes content. ... A publisher is legal responsible for the posted content and the source"

2019-09-01 00:48:21 UTC  

right and publishers edit

2019-09-01 00:48:24 UTC  

section 230 is simply an exemption

2019-09-01 00:48:25 UTC  

Curation implies publishing.

2019-09-01 00:48:29 UTC  

this is the distinction

2019-09-01 00:48:40 UTC  

Anyway, the nature of Facebook and Twitter means it's easy to get back on anyway.

2019-09-01 00:48:47 UTC  

sect 230 sits on TOP of those defintions

2019-09-01 00:48:48 UTC  

An exemption that makes them ***NOT LIABLE*** for anything posted on their site.

2019-09-01 00:48:49 UTC  

So I don't even understand why you're crying when you can just go back

2019-09-01 00:48:51 UTC  

Free of charge

2019-09-01 00:48:55 UTC  

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-09-01 00:48:56 UTC  

Do you know how much that matters?

2019-09-01 00:49:03 UTC  

@Zakhan exactly!

2019-09-01 00:49:03 UTC  

thats not a valid argument as to why they shuld still have 230 protection though

2019-09-01 00:49:17 UTC  

@Weez it's because no matter what, certain topics will be eventually silenced

2019-09-01 00:49:27 UTC  

that exception is the only thing that makes the internet businesss model work

2019-09-01 00:49:27 UTC  

they clearly think they are liable for their content because they edit it and curate it

2019-09-01 00:49:33 UTC  

Then just make your account to push people to your website where it can be spoken about.

2019-09-01 00:49:34 UTC  

Easy.

2019-09-01 00:49:41 UTC  

but they dont want to be legally bound by that cuz they want their cake and to eat it too

2019-09-01 00:49:45 UTC  

And now look at that, you're expanding your website.

2019-09-01 00:49:50 UTC  

Remove their exemption, see them curate everything so excessively trying not be taken to court for what people write and say, then see how they go into a death spiral.

2019-09-01 00:49:54 UTC  

otherwise evrery single person you host would have to be carefully vetted

2019-09-01 00:49:59 UTC  

@Weez but there aren't better places to go as there aren't as many people, and as many different political people on these alternative platforms

2019-09-01 00:50:04 UTC  

Getting removed isn't the end of the world.

2019-09-01 00:50:07 UTC  

Make another account.

2019-09-01 00:50:08 UTC  

Zakhan gets it

2019-09-01 00:50:11 UTC  

Who gives a shit?

2019-09-01 00:50:20 UTC  

Push people to your platform.

2019-09-01 00:50:23 UTC  

they won't GIVE free services anymore

2019-09-01 00:50:24 UTC  

@ManAnimal the exemption will still be available to sites that dont curate

2019-09-01 00:50:30 UTC  

If people like it, then they'll stay and use it.

2019-09-01 00:50:30 UTC  

negative

2019-09-01 00:50:32 UTC  

Then it'll grow.

2019-09-01 00:50:40 UTC  

the law doesn't work that way

2019-09-01 00:50:41 UTC  

@Weez it's never that simple though

2019-09-01 00:50:44 UTC  

But it is.

2019-09-01 00:50:52 UTC  

Remove the exemption from Facebook and other non-free platforms breaching the terms of that exemption. Then see how the sites that follow the terms get more traffic, when the big sites start over-curating.

2019-09-01 00:51:02 UTC  

its not about completely removing it. its about examining whether or not it should apply to facebook, google and twitter @ManAnimal