you need some BASIS to investigate

you have no standing

the study i linked earlier

that is the issue

is the basis

@UnScottable I agree however that is obviously up to the courts. You will need a lot of evidence

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/08/psychologist-google-generated-at-least-2-6-million-votes-for-hillary.php

you don't understand the system

i have seeen this video

Their CEO's have said so. They have said so out there out in the public repeatedly. They always say that they are doing it for the right reasons, but they are still doing it.

the proof and evidence and the case and etc... is all being drawn up and prepared by people who can explain this much better then i can. im sure.

if you have no basis to bring an issue before a judge, they judge won't grant your an exception or an injunction

you will never have your argument even heard

are you a lawyer?

i've fought this issue first hand with 5 lawyers

so not a lawyer

gotcha

_jots down a note_

are you over 40

Hasn't a proper case been presented to the... FTC? by a group of lawyers?

So what is the basis you need?

not over 40

thought so

if we use that argument, you lose every time

what does age have to do with this

Manimal, this isn't a gerontocracy, you old fart.

boomer logic

here we go

it's calle experience; how many times have you been in court?

i said i dont know earlier

i said a case is being drawn up

i might not be an attorney but i HAVE won cased pro se AGAINST attorneys

by people who are much better at explaining this and understanding this

then you or I

Then shut up you fucking nig

no u

it is about standing; people can't get their cases heard without making an argument in terms of law

The paper that he's citing isn't very good.. @UnScottable

you litterally need and exception to the exception

👏🏻

there are other forms of proof i could show you