Then shut up you fucking nig
no u
it is about standing; people can't get their cases heard without making an argument in terms of law
The paper that he's citing isn't very good.. @UnScottable
you litterally need and exception to the exception
👏🏻
there are other forms of proof i could show you
if youd like weez
since thats not good enough for whatever reason
Which all stem from this guy talking?
Abut this paper?
you don't understand the argument
nope
Send me some more.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g1VeElBAeas/
anyone who tries to file suit against social media won't survive a motion to dismiss
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ricI5t66cj8/
Well, they have literal billions of dollars
no way you fight that power
and anotha one https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/
you don't seem to understand that all the evidence in the world doesn't matter if the judge won't sit down and listen to it
im not going to argue a hypothetical with you godman
evidence doesn't come into play until they establish that you have standing and a basis for a claim
yeah
corruption as usual
the allegations are initially taken at face value without evidence that comes lat er
gotta love our incompetent government
right
fucking A
:/
reminds me of a quote from max payne 3
and thus the allegations will be dismissed before the evidence is heard in open court
i dnt see how you cant see... that you are acting as if you know the outcome of the case before its even introduced... even though you arent a lawyer
🤷
like i said. not going to debate a hypothetical outcome with you
perhaps itll be dismissed. perhaps it wont be. i am saying, that i dont know
It has been presented to the FTC. Hopefully they will find everything and present that evidence to a court case.
Are you saying that you need evidence first instead of allegations?
you don't understand how the process works. there are filters that stop cases from being brought before the court. only certain forms of info are allowed to be submitted to convice the judge you have standing
well we will see wont we 🙂
nothing you have shown me deals with the fact that they are except
