@Marushia Dark i said ww2.

americans actually didnt want to punish germans that much

france did

britain sortof did

Honestly we dont have the man power for that big an op

ww1 was a big oopsie blam

Whoopsie poopsie

The problem with the current paradigm is that it allows a 3rd rate nuclear power to frame a superpower in order to draw retaliation from another superpower

Cats out of the bag now though Manimal

as long as mutual retaliation treaties exist, it will only take a minor nuclear exchange to set off a cascade reaction

British army has 80,000 active soldiers, of that about 25% of them are broken or injured, so 60,000 deployable, of that you can only put them on for a max of 6 months, so at any one time 30,000, of that half of them are already away covering various things <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Setting aside whether FDR actually knew in advance about Pearl Harbor, you could argue we were attacked first by Japan and were justified in retaliating. The Empire of the Rising Sun was actually quite ruthless and fanatical compared to the Japanese of today. They were a lot like ISIL in their tactics of beheadings, kamikazing, and terror.

that's what bothers me about the dismissal of the mid-range missle treaty

@Marushia Dark okay, but we shouldve left germany alone, and not sent aid to the euros

because only japan had attacked.

The VHR units are probs the only ones you could call on to move quickly and even then they aren't a fighting force to hold ground

germany didnt violate the NAP

it makes it too easy for people to have the false beleif that a small nuclear exchange won't lead to massive retaliation

So Hentai will fix ISIS??

GB no longer has the capacity to occupy tbh <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

You do realize that most of the actual atrocities of the Nazis - such as the Holocaust - weren't actually discovered until more or less AFTER the war was already won, right? Like IIRC, it was the Red Army who first found the camps (and they weren't entirely trustworthy after incidents like Katyn).

This is why UK needs to end foreign aid and increase military budget.

@Marushia Dark exactly, so under your argument

we had no business

fighting germany

in ww2.

THere was plenty of indication of an attack on Pearl Harbor but then there are always indications. One cannot realistically take each seriously. Hind-sight is 20/20

Basically, yeah

**what**

You know how the British army operates now? It sends out small training units to train up locals to fight with some force protection to stop them getting slaughtered <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

@ManAnimal Hence why I said, for sake of argument, I'm putting that aside

That is basically how GB will operate wars going forwards

And frankly thats what we should do with HK, send out training units, teach the hong kongers, and arm them 🤷

it's called 'proxy warfare' storin

eh

Yes and we are really good at it dude

I dont see USA getting involved in hong kong

so we should've let the nazis take france

i understand.

trump would be eviscerated politically

apologies.