If those sins were so bad that we'd all "hate to see it", we'd be constantly hateful

We'd have nothing but hate in our souls

And then I'd have to ask: why is hate not on the list of deadly sins?

Or why is hubris not on the list? After all it's often the precursor to other deadly sins

Hubris goes under Pride.

Maybe, alright

Hate is also a little too generalized. Hate is also necessary, as hate is highly dependent on personal perspective.

I hate pain, but masochists love that shit

And sadists love inflicting it.

I love sex, but lust is a deadly sin

See the problem? You can continue this train of logic

It's undesirable lol. We hate thots, fat people, millionaires, lazy people, people who take stuff to seriously, people who *waaaaant* stuff that don't need it, and people full of themselves. Just because Christian's do it too doesn't make us hypocrites it's what makes us and all human. And with all that being undesirable you'd think there's a higher standard of what people should properly be to deal/confront the world and reality itself.

My issue with relating the Bible to the deadly sins is the Bible doesn't go over how all of them can be accepted, but in excess they become deadly. The sins were pre-Jesus.

I don't hate thots, or fat people, or millionaires, or lazy people

Not by default, it depends on what they do exactly

I agree with lios hate is a generalization its probably an issue with my vernacular

I think hate is a mostly harmful feeling

Totes

I agree

The Bible says lust is more deadly than hate, how am I supposed to believe that?

Lust literally creates life

Hate doesn't typically

Because if you gave into your sexy gf's every desire and be her penny pig it's worse than just being a hateful jerk because then people could/would just ignore you. At least in a perfect world. You'd probably be arrested or killed.

Or something

I mean

If we put that in equal terms, then if you hate everything and everyone, or if you lust after everything and everyone

I'd say hate kills a lot more

Until you summon Slaanesh. Should probably watch how far we go.

I think what the Bible often lacks is proper context

A few days ago I criticized the story of Noah's arc

Not necessarily you can hate and not have to kill people. Just like you can lust and accidentally squeeze to hard when she says choke me.

Then they me too you or just die

The idea of the seven sins is excess. Any of them can work, without causing much, or any harm, but in excess they become what they were named for: Deadly.

What does his story teach us? He believed there were signs that a huge, never before seen flood would come and he centered his whole life around surviving that flood. He had no piece of evidence except what God told him. Now, no one else had God tell them that there was a flood coming, so from a purely scientific perspective, Noah was vastly outmatched by the evidence.
And what happened? The flood came, he survived, along with the animal kingdom, and he was proven right.
How is that a good moral of the story? Noah was clearly insane. He should've been proven wrong, the flood should've never come.

It wasn't a moral statement, it was a "fear me" from God.

But it is a moral statement, too

@Lios that's why you got the 7 virtues. You can imagine people would limit these 7 deadly sins as best they could and tried instead for the virtues.

It tells us that the insane man who tells us the world's gonna end was right and we should listen to him

Even if we don't have any evidence for that

That sounds like a horrible message to me to teach kids

Believe some unbacked claims without evidence... but not the others.