Message from @Miniature Menace
Discord ID: 619319630493646858
When?
The Rosenblum I mentioned the other day was literally Jewish in the wiki bio.
It's like s shitty B-8 program you run which says "can I name the jew" and then doesn't care about accuracy yet hopes to scattershot maybe get one in twelve right and claim victory.
Do you have the data to back this up?
Nah not worth that level of involvement. Just an observation. Like you crowing days later that you accidentally got one 'right' once.
Via the echoes, I'm not making the claim that *all* people who have this name are Jews, I'm either asserting the claim, or the suspicion, that *this specific person* is Jewish.
Except the Rosenblum "crowing" wasn't "days later" it was literally that same day, soon after you expressed doubt.
Yes I rather imagine that you find opportunities to place jews into whatever conspiracies your demented mind cooks up. Here we agree.
They place themselves there. I just *notice* them. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Mostly you imagine them. It's like firing birdshot into a barn. Occasionally you hit a chicken. Because inevitably you will. It takes a special brand of retard to then claim that your shots are accurate.
Evidence or GTFO
Oh lord the evidence is clear in our previous conversations.
No it isn't.
You're literally just making up claims.
Evidence. Or G-T-F-O
Hell where did we leave off last time? I think you were asserting that alleged adaptations in imagined behavioral characteristics could, in fact did, occur over a shorter timeframe than known adaptations with very clear benefits....
The thing is, I don't even care one way or another. A goy traitor to the American people is as bad as a Jewish one.
We literally have examples of trait distribution changing over the last *century* due to changes in *population* ratios. Extrapolate internal population subdivisions and non-uniform rates of trait distribution, and what do you know? You don't even *need* entirely *new* adaptations for noticeable shifts in population norms. Even if we're assuming *ancient* traits and characteristics, this still can happen.
Well this is progres. You now acknowledge that by 'jew' you mean 'people I disagree with' sort of like when leftists say 'Nazi'
I'm saying they're jewish, because I suspect they're jewish. If they aren't jewish, I still disagree with them, and believe they're undermining the people of the nation.
Plenty of Jews *don't* do this.
Yet you obsessively label them jews. Almost as though the nation were not nearly as important to you as fearing jews. Sorta like Ilhan Omar really.
Why it is almost as though horeshoes were real and not mythical objects......
someone has to label the jews as jews to keep them from shape shifting ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Why cannot shitstains be just shitstains? Why is it important if they might be Jew?
We have no lack of shitstains of all races.
because it's a critical vector of organization
and because it's frankly mind boggling how few people notice it
Then point out the links to other people rather than just the assumption that Jews are a monolith.
it's like when you see celebrity thot who is getting over the hill suddenly become really interested in feminism
Jews are disproportionally commie but they are also disproportionally libertarian.
So I don't understand the idea of Jewish monolith.
and you point out, "wow, she's getting over the hill, i wonder what made her decide to suddenly start condemning men for being attracted to younger, traditionally pretty women?"
I never claimed it was a monolith
Then there's no worth in pointing out the Jew.
If it has no meaning.
There is no point in doing so.
Unless you have malicious intent.