Message from @2K
Discord ID: 619252675678044160
did they not i recall it being called out
If the Government does not have the confidence of the commons then either some other group needs to prove they are capable of a majority
Which no one can
Or a general election happens
But because of the fixed term Parliament act... NOPE, lets just throw 400 years of Parliamentary practice out of a fucking window
yup
it was introduced in the coalition gov was it not?
one of those seemed like a good idea at the time jobs
"Jacob Rees-Mogg has announced the Government will table a new election motion on Monday evening. After the anti-No Deal bill is set to become law…
This would satisfy Labour’s conditions for voting for an election. Will they keep their word..?"
I was reeing against that piece of wank, at the time, as it would introduce super majority voting to the commons, for which there is no precedent in the UK
And it doesn't really matter if the brexit bill is passed into law
A new Parliament can just immediately repeal that law
pretty sure corbyn will only give in to elections only if an extension is agreed with EU too
An extension which a new Parliament could simply dishonour
if they make bojo go to EU and ask for an extention
he is donezo in a ge
But yes, that short term goal would prevent Boris taking us out of the EU, before 2020 using an election as the delivery mechanism
Technically, Boris cannot be forced to go to the EU by Parliament
then its a vote of no confidence and a caretaker gov
That would
But they'd need to agree to that
Which Parliament won't <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
it's ridiculous
when it comes to stopping hard brexit your parliament seems unified tbh
Current Parliament
labour+ libdems +snp could do it
If a GE was called No Deal would be quite popular
it's a good thing that the opinions of a portion of 600 people are so much more important than the millions who voted them in. oh wait.....
The Conservatives would purge the Remainers and would gain a majority
people can be dumb
thats why we elect representatives
to govern
if the people are dumb it follows that they elected people who dont know what theyre doing anyway, that point is null & void
And what if they don't want to govern so they just give away out rights to a different entity and force people to go along with it despite people not wanting to?
you used the key word there 'representative' - thats the part they arent doing.
>people are dumb
>people can be dumb
which one i used again
ooooof
silence