Al Capone was right to have trucks full of guns

What if your civilization invests in those not invested within your civilization.

Its dumb. Its even suicidal... yet we seemingly are...

Alright enough shitposting, lets have an honest argument for a second

Sure

Do you think only defensive means are a moral right?

No

No

So then this would mean

Well

Contextually

If I were to disarm someone, that's an offensive mean

So that would be a moral right then?

Depends on context

You should kill those who engage in a sadistic and adversarial relationship they consider to be prey

That is to fight evil itself

Ah, good

Did this person rape a bus full of school children?

If yes disarm them

If not feck off

So you are in favor of disarming, even destroying those who threaten your well-being

I do destroy those who threaten my well being

Rather I have

@ETBrooD it's not about my well being

Your what then?

(My well being also encapsulating my family's)

@ETBrooD I'm talking about destroying evil, it's not about how it affects me

Wait

If evil doesn't affect you

How is it evil towards you

There is plenty of evil in this world I could have ignored

I don't care if it is

Who or what decides what is evil

Some things are objectively evil

I mean you just said, it doesn't matter how it affects you, then how do you decide who or what is evil?

Others not so much

@ETBrooD I can imagine myself in the position of the person who is victimized. That doesn't mean I need to be personally affected

Chaos thinks I and my masonic brothers are objectively evil

Yeah but people's rights are your rights, too

Oh look, the Spooks are multiplying

So if someone else is affected by evil, and you have the right to defend them for it, then that's the same as you defending yourself against evil