If the plebs are amassing guns then that's a problem, whereas its historically been the right of all invested men of a society to be armed

I like my guns, most people should have one

You all will be crushed under the weight of your hubris.

I will create a facist state of freedom

Freedom is non negotiable

The English Bill of Rights from the late 1600's had it so all Protestant Englishman had the right to bear arms. Not Catholics, nor Welsh, Irish and Scots

I think Hitler's and Stalin's second comings should have as many nuclear bombs as they want to, you people surely agree with me, right?

Doesn't seem so controversial to me

Obv

So the real problem is investing people within society...

@Tiberius

F R E E D O M . I S . N O N . N E G O T I A B L E

Recreational mcnukes my man

Yes that is what I said

I agree

If you have people who aren't invested, then expect violence.

Congratulations captain obvious

I think Thanos deservedly had an infinity glove

Why not, he did so much good with it

*Thanos did nothing wrong*

I mean, he did deserve it because he had the will to power

Yeah it's totally a good thing he had one

All those infinity stones in exactly the right hands

And maybe even state violence to enforce a political order will be justified in as so far that the uninvested are the barbarians at the gates attempting to tear the civilization down...

Maybe you should be invested in your civilization if you don't want to be a slave to someone who has the will to power

Yeah I mean the CCP totally deserves all its military power over the Chinese people

It's a common good

Al Capone was right to have trucks full of guns

What if your civilization invests in those not invested within your civilization.

Its dumb. Its even suicidal... yet we seemingly are...

Alright enough shitposting, lets have an honest argument for a second

Sure

Do you think only defensive means are a moral right?

No

No

So then this would mean

Well

Contextually

If I were to disarm someone, that's an offensive mean

So that would be a moral right then?

Depends on context

You should kill those who engage in a sadistic and adversarial relationship they consider to be prey