There are alot of factors that contribute to our declining birth rates

exactly, so why scream about them when I'm talking about *reproductive* health

I was making a tongue in cheek mention of that

Any promoting of homosexual lifestyle

Mainly older reproduction in women

Is relatively imposing a choice or lifestyle that gravitates one away from reproduction

are STD tests an exclusive facet of "homosexual lifestyle?"

So therefore any homosexual propaganda effects birthrates insofar as the number of people choose to begin homosexual lifestyles as a result, not a thing one is able to measure I'd wager

answer the question

Homesexuals are at higher risk

are STD tests an exclusive facet of homosexual lifestyle

All I ever said was that homosexuals are higher risk and that I didn't want to pay for healthcare costs associated with STD testing

@Imaorange Citation needed

There isn't anything that requires a citation there

still not answering the question

I literally even aid you probably can't even measure it's impact

Its not a relevant question

No one said it was

it absoltely is. I'm saying "STD," all he can say is "gays"

Who says this that homosexual propaganda results in more people living a homosexual lifestyle

We said they are at higher risk

The tism is strong

Prostitutes are too and they should pay more

Because there are more openly gay people now than before there was pro-gay propaganda

well prostitutes are criminals in the US, so likely they wouldnt get coverage for anything

You still need to demonstrate that it's caused by homosexual propaganda

And not anything else instead

I think we should stop giving illegals abortions and healthcare

You can't begin to suggest to me that society beginning to welcome non-straight lifestyles didn't have an effect in their prevalence

$$$ pay up hombre

stop covering illegals' healthcare, yes. no argument here

Am I doubting your wild claim? Yes I am

What else would it be Einstein

Bad argument

Not really lol, if you are trying to suggest that openly accepting gay people socially (propaganda) isn't what made more people openly gay

Then what else is it

Name an alternative that I have to defend against

I'm not saying it *doesn't* cause more homosexuality, I'm saying you need to prove that it *does*

No I don't, what a semantical waste of time. I need to prove social propaganda is effective

And I'm saying he needs to answer if STD tests are exclusively for gays

I already did, because there are more gay people