Message from @ETBrooD

Discord ID: 648762169818742795


2019-11-26 05:46:36 UTC  

I never actually referenced homosexuals and their effect on child-rearing but I could mention IVF, surrogate couples, adoption, and gays who closet themselves far enough to reproduce before coming out do all exist

2019-11-26 05:46:43 UTC  

There are alot of factors that contribute to our declining birth rates

2019-11-26 05:46:43 UTC  

exactly, so why scream about them when I'm talking about *reproductive* health

2019-11-26 05:46:55 UTC  

I was making a tongue in cheek mention of that

2019-11-26 05:46:59 UTC  

Any promoting of homosexual lifestyle

2019-11-26 05:47:13 UTC  

Mainly older reproduction in women

2019-11-26 05:47:17 UTC  

Is relatively imposing a choice or lifestyle that gravitates one away from reproduction

2019-11-26 05:47:37 UTC  

are STD tests an exclusive facet of "homosexual lifestyle?"

2019-11-26 05:47:59 UTC  

So therefore any homosexual propaganda effects birthrates insofar as the number of people choose to begin homosexual lifestyles as a result, not a thing one is able to measure I'd wager

2019-11-26 05:48:10 UTC  

answer the question

2019-11-26 05:48:12 UTC  

Homesexuals are at higher risk

2019-11-26 05:48:23 UTC  

are STD tests an exclusive facet of homosexual lifestyle

2019-11-26 05:48:31 UTC  

All I ever said was that homosexuals are higher risk and that I didn't want to pay for healthcare costs associated with STD testing

2019-11-26 05:48:32 UTC  

@Imaorange Citation needed

2019-11-26 05:48:41 UTC  

There isn't anything that requires a citation there

2019-11-26 05:48:46 UTC  

still not answering the question

2019-11-26 05:48:54 UTC  

I literally even aid you probably can't even measure it's impact

2019-11-26 05:48:55 UTC  

Its not a relevant question

2019-11-26 05:49:08 UTC  

No one said it was

2019-11-26 05:49:12 UTC  

it absoltely is. I'm saying "STD," all he can say is "gays"

2019-11-26 05:49:14 UTC  

Who says this that homosexual propaganda results in more people living a homosexual lifestyle

2019-11-26 05:49:16 UTC  

We said they are at higher risk

2019-11-26 05:49:19 UTC  

The tism is strong

2019-11-26 05:49:28 UTC  

Prostitutes are too and they should pay more

2019-11-26 05:49:36 UTC  

Because there are more openly gay people now than before there was pro-gay propaganda

2019-11-26 05:49:53 UTC  

well prostitutes are criminals in the US, so likely they wouldnt get coverage for anything

2019-11-26 05:49:55 UTC  

You still need to demonstrate that it's caused by homosexual propaganda

2019-11-26 05:50:06 UTC  

And not anything else instead

2019-11-26 05:50:07 UTC  

I think we should stop giving illegals abortions and healthcare

2019-11-26 05:50:24 UTC  

You can't begin to suggest to me that society beginning to welcome non-straight lifestyles didn't have an effect in their prevalence

2019-11-26 05:50:29 UTC  

$$$ pay up hombre

2019-11-26 05:50:34 UTC  

stop covering illegals' healthcare, yes. no argument here

2019-11-26 05:50:35 UTC  

Am I doubting your wild claim? Yes I am

2019-11-26 05:50:41 UTC  

What else would it be Einstein

2019-11-26 05:50:47 UTC  

Bad argument

2019-11-26 05:51:14 UTC  

Not really lol, if you are trying to suggest that openly accepting gay people socially (propaganda) isn't what made more people openly gay

2019-11-26 05:51:17 UTC  

Then what else is it

2019-11-26 05:51:30 UTC  

Name an alternative that I have to defend against

2019-11-26 05:51:32 UTC  

I'm not saying it *doesn't* cause more homosexuality, I'm saying you need to prove that it *does*

2019-11-26 05:52:00 UTC  

No I don't, what a semantical waste of time. I need to prove social propaganda is effective

2019-11-26 05:52:01 UTC  

And I'm saying he needs to answer if STD tests are exclusively for gays