I guess I might have used a stronger word than was necessary.

Well I mean

The complete opposite of the truth, that's pretty strong

Well truth is in the eye of the beholder

There's one singular objective truth, but there are many ways to make improvements in the world

And I don't care about migrants being stopped at the borders

They can fuck off for all I care if they mess up my country

I not quite sure how this is related to our argument.

The point is

We do not need to be perfect truthbringers, we only need to be better people

Don't demand perfection from yourself in a world where we're not even halfway close to it

ahh you see the path to ultimate truth is a noble one.

Look, you can strive for perfect information, I don't. Because it's a hindrance in this reality.

Not that there is an end to the path.

I do not mislead people by showing them the truth with imperfect numbers, as long as the numbers are strong enough to still prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that my argument is true

Perhaps. But wouldn't it be better if it was closer to perfect numbers?

Perfection is a destroyer, it kills progress

Depends on what type of perfection.

The more you strive for perfection, the less progress you make, it's analysis paralysis

We already agree that the study could be better right?

Yes, and when I say "could" then I mean it's realistic

Doable, not just possible

But we can still use those existing numbers

And we should in my opinion

Of course

I do as well

Well then we don't seem to disagree on anything after all

correct

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1556756/

All the gay peados in this study it's madness

Seeing as there never was such a thing as white slaves, we wuz senators incoming

https://sci-hub.se/10.1126/science.aay6826

Full paper

@Xaverius You're kidding right?

@Christopholaes Slavery was invented in USA, duh

@Xaverius Lol, okay have to be trolling.

Imagine being serious on the internet.

"Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against male children is approximately 2:1, while the ratio of gynephiles to androphiles among the general population is approximately 20:1."

So, almost all women are lesbian?

One would assume that if women were androphiles, if they were heterosexual. How is it that general population is 20:1 in favor of gynephiles if almost every woman is not lesbian?

I guess it only studies male perpetrators (because women cannot rape according to many legislatures). It's just funny it doesn't even bother to mention it's limiting the evaluation to male perpetrators only.