I agree, but we should still use the past research on this
Of course
This is not misleading people
This is showing them the truth
I guess I might have used a stronger word than was necessary.
Well I mean
The complete opposite of the truth, that's pretty strong
Well truth is in the eye of the beholder
There's one singular objective truth, but there are many ways to make improvements in the world
And I don't care about migrants being stopped at the borders
They can fuck off for all I care if they mess up my country
I not quite sure how this is related to our argument.
The point is
We do not need to be perfect truthbringers, we only need to be better people
Don't demand perfection from yourself in a world where we're not even halfway close to it
ahh you see the path to ultimate truth is a noble one.
Look, you can strive for perfect information, I don't. Because it's a hindrance in this reality.
Not that there is an end to the path.
I do not mislead people by showing them the truth with imperfect numbers, as long as the numbers are strong enough to still prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that my argument is true
Perhaps. But wouldn't it be better if it was closer to perfect numbers?
Perfection is a destroyer, it kills progress
Depends on what type of perfection.
The more you strive for perfection, the less progress you make, it's analysis paralysis
We already agree that the study could be better right?
Yes, and when I say "could" then I mean it's realistic
Doable, not just possible
But we can still use those existing numbers
And we should in my opinion
I do as well
Well then we don't seem to disagree on anything after all
correct
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1556756/
All the gay peados in this study it's madness
Seeing as there never was such a thing as white slaves, we wuz senators incoming
https://sci-hub.se/10.1126/science.aay6826
Full paper
@Xaverius You're kidding right?
@Christopholaes Slavery was invented in USA, duh
@Xaverius Lol, okay have to be trolling.
