Message from @randomNPCno3
Discord ID: 646431897484001280
He just looks like a smug asshole
he kindof is
but he's better than shapiro
He writes like one, too
and I think he's done a video I watched and had to shower afterward
Matt Walsh shares his name with an actor which must be lame for both of them.
Andrew Klavan seems alright but he looks like a used car salesman
Talks like one to sometimes
klavan is probably the best out of them
If I listen to any of their shows it's Klavans
Shapiro: I am not a journalist I am an opinionated political commentator
Lemmings on this channel: BiAsEd MuCh BeN!?!?!?!
Yall are a special kind of stupid sometimes
Who said he's a journalist? He doesn't bother investigating his claims.
Then again nor does about 90% of other self-described journos, but still
Political commentator is accurate.
Is that somehow a spiteful, being a commentator rather than a journalist?
in other news, I think Tibs over here will get a good confirmation-bias-wank over a politician suddenly revising his own historical stances
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXU5hZ1W1Js
^^^^
BIG FACTS
Ben Shapiro is a hack *posts kyle kulinski* you are something else Joker xD
ben shapiro is kinda a hack
hes good on domestic social issues but on the foreign policy stuff... ehhhhh
and immigration
Kyle Kulinski is just the ben shapiro of the left
<:hyperthink:462282519883284480>
No its not being spiteful its being honest and Shapiro is usually well sourced and typically good at admitting wrongdoing even if I disagree with about 40% of what he has to say. Keep sucking Justice Democrat dick tho if thats what floats your boat.
well see i hate ben from the right
wow, that really set him off
cry more
and all I said was Ben's not a journalist. If anything thats a compliment
was shitting on his underlings more tbh
oh jesus christ, please let this not turn into a mirror of trump-russia arrest fest
although a few of those cunts were actually guilty of other shit
I have an incomplete blog about the iraq war
I've been trying to condense all the various myths about it, such as the idea there were no WMD's found or the idea we killed bajillions of civilians (Saddam did), and so on and so forth, but it's not finished as sourcing everything is tiresome. But, basically the idea things got terrible worse after we invaded is, more or less not true, everything in Iraq was falling apart long before we invaded. As for WMD's, Saddam had already wiped out a city of about 40,000 with them, mostly using chemical weapons, but they also had 100,000 pounds of uranium, 9000 liters of anthrax, weaponized west nile virus among other things, and various other biological and chemical weapons, including Sarin, VX and Botox, which are among the deadliest poisons on earth and surprisingly easy to make. The simply reality is that, he was a signifigant threat and with the country destabilizing, there was a real fear these weapons would end up on the open market, such as in the hands of terrorists, of which many of them did. That's not the only reason for the war, but it's one of the main misleading comments the media to this day continues to repeat