Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 644255848704638976


2019-11-13 19:20:38 UTC  

At the moment Britain needs better policing than the right to bear arms

2019-11-13 19:20:43 UTC  

That would increase

2019-11-13 19:20:46 UTC  

For no gain.

2019-11-13 19:20:54 UTC  

It needs better laws and institutions, not better policing

2019-11-13 19:20:57 UTC  

People that want to commit a crime here are going to find a way to do it regardless, Having guns won't enable them if they will find an alternative route if guns are not an option

2019-11-13 19:21:12 UTC  

Okay? So why make firearms more accessible? @The Electric Lizard

2019-11-13 19:21:15 UTC  

I think that was proved by the homemade SMG

2019-11-13 19:21:15 UTC  

What it would do is allow people to defend themselves when someone decides to commit a crime

2019-11-13 19:21:19 UTC  

The police are an instatusions arnt they

2019-11-13 19:21:20 UTC  

They’ll just steal them from people.

2019-11-13 19:21:25 UTC  

Means they have MORE weapons.

2019-11-13 19:21:26 UTC  

Thus reducing the death toll

2019-11-13 19:21:30 UTC  

The police are an institution, policing is an action

2019-11-13 19:21:39 UTC  

I guess

2019-11-13 19:21:49 UTC  

We have problems with the police and the judicial system, along with the laws and priorities

2019-11-13 19:21:53 UTC  

Your argument provides me with justification for not having them @The Electric Lizard

2019-11-13 19:22:18 UTC  

“They’re going to break the law to get them” So they will steal them from law abiding people

2019-11-13 19:22:26 UTC  

Meaning they have more access to firearms

2019-11-13 19:22:26 UTC  

They do this already

2019-11-13 19:22:30 UTC  

Yeah.

2019-11-13 19:22:44 UTC  

And think about increasing the amount of firearms in circulation.

2019-11-13 19:22:46 UTC  

If an armed individual were to halt the process of the robbery

2019-11-13 19:22:50 UTC  

They’re going to do it MORE

2019-11-13 19:22:51 UTC  

The crisis is averted

2019-11-13 19:22:52 UTC  

Crimes will happen no matter what our policy on guns is so we should at least ensure that innocent civilians are given guns to ensure that when said person commits a crime their victims can defend themselves

2019-11-13 19:23:04 UTC  

We should ensure less people die.

2019-11-13 19:23:08 UTC  

More guns, more deaths.

2019-11-13 19:23:11 UTC  

So?

2019-11-13 19:23:21 UTC  

<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

2019-11-13 19:23:24 UTC  

More guns does not equate to more death

2019-11-13 19:23:29 UTC  

If the people dying are criminals killed in self defence by their victims why is that a bad thing?

2019-11-13 19:23:33 UTC  

"ensuring less people die" shouldn't be the primary motivation

2019-11-13 19:23:40 UTC  

Gunshot compared to knife wounds? @AMERIJESUS

2019-11-13 19:23:49 UTC  

Gunshot compared to “acid” ?

2019-11-13 19:24:02 UTC  

Most gunshot victims in the United States pull through

2019-11-13 19:24:11 UTC  

A knife is far more dangerous in close quarters

2019-11-13 19:24:26 UTC  

A gunshot has a much higher chance of killing someone

2019-11-13 19:24:32 UTC  

Chest, head, artery.

2019-11-13 19:24:40 UTC  

They’re likely dead.

2019-11-13 19:24:51 UTC  

And a knife can cause irreversible damage to organs and arteries

2019-11-13 19:25:00 UTC  

I can survive a cut to the face and head, I can’t a gunshot.