Then who would decide policies?

Just because it is democratic doesnt mean it is automatically good

How would it even work

How is it different then currently then

Just? Sure. But not automatically good

The executive that the people would vote for and the Parliament that the people would vote for

you're basically

describing our current system

You can’t argue Mob rule over human rights is good

am I being trolled

yes

Bruh

The main change would how the seats are distributed

omg

we finally get somewhere

he wants proportional system

All you are arguing for is proportional representation

not FPTP

Basically proportional representation

Something I agree with

How did it take

this fucking long

Fucking hell!

to get somewhere sensible

Our system already allows Parliament to repeal any law

Holy moly

So i am fine with that

Lizard you really need to work on how you communicate your views

You could of just said you wanted proportional representation

I agree with that

Same

I’m actually laughing my arse off

Only difference is in his system he would allow Nazi germany to happen again and I wouldn’t

Well in Proportional representation that could happen

If the Nazis got enough seats they could repeal any laws already made

Your system allows nothing to progress @bobthebuilder69

It's just as bad as his.

Stuff can progress

Just not in violation of human rights

I prefer a constitution but that constitution should always be changeable by the people

How, when regulation violates human rights?