It is also more Democratic then saying that the people are banned from changing laws @Mavalance
So, they won't be able to do anything in your system?
Yes
It is
It will be byzantine and static?
Unable to shift and move?
I was joking around with the monarchy @PureEvilPie
Direct Democracy is better
That means no regulation of anything? Since that would violate human rights?
And I am saying not all laws should be able to be changed
Mob rule Democracy isn’t good so arguing it’s more democratic isn’t an argument
How’s direct democracy gonna work
Are we gonna be at the polls every weekend?
It is Democratic and in my opinion good
direct democracy on a country this big
it's so dumb
Monarchy is reliant on an inbred idiot with no connection to the common man to make decisions for everyone
@bobthebuilder69 Every few years like currently
Yes, this is good @Dubdogelmo
Then who would decide policies?
Just because it is democratic doesnt mean it is automatically good
How would it even work
How is it different then currently then
Just? Sure. But not automatically good
The executive that the people would vote for and the Parliament that the people would vote for
you're basically
describing our current system
You can’t argue Mob rule over human rights is good
am I being trolled
yes
Bruh
The main change would how the seats are distributed
omg
we finally get somewhere
he wants proportional system
All you are arguing for is proportional representation
not FPTP
Basically proportional representation
Something I agree with
How did it take
