?

No, we started by talking about heritability of IQ

Fetal alcohol syndrome is different from alcoholism.

That's what @XoviaHarmile said.

Then I argued that nutrition plays a big part in the development of IQ

And then I argued that nutrition plays a big part in genes, too

Stop gish-galloping already.

I'm talking to Xovia

https://delphihealthgroup.com/alcohol/hereditary/

You are still gish-galloping.

You never admitted any mistake on fetal alcohol syndrome being genetic.

I thought you weren't interested in arguing anymore whiic

Drinking alcohol doesn't give you AUD, it isn't changing your genetics

Fine, I wouldn't reach you anyway. You don't acknowledge developmental disorders to exist outside of "it causes mutation in genes, herpa derpa".

Just read the article @XoviaHarmile

https://gyazo.com/9745658c2602de7bf7d5ffd7ebe4292f

🇴 🇻 🇪 🇷 🇱 🇦 🇵

@whiic

@Monstrous Moonshine Similar levels of denseness experienced, yes.

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

@ETBrooD if they are twins they'll have the same genes, just because one due to social situations starts drinking doesn't mean that his genes have changed from those of their sibling. In the quote you highlighted it doesn't seem to suggest that genes causing a highly likelihood of addiction isn't being caused by alcoholism, but is just common

Although I don't know where from the article you've taken the quote from, so I could just be misinterpreting it

Anyway, I'mma go part-take in the pastime of geniuses

Playing Minecraft

That wasn't what was tested obviously

They tested the effect of drinking on the twins' offspring

Listen this is why people hate talking to you whiic, you argue someone, they fuck up and point and then that’s all it’s about. Everyone that argues you fucks up at one point or another

Hell I don’t even understand why you debate someone other than to try them look dumb

And of course, no one wants to admit their mistakes...*to you*

Because then you wouldn’t drop it

Then “oh so how can you be correct about the heritability of acholoism if you fucked up on FAS?”

Not only that, but I didn't even fuck up, because the argument was two-fold

1) nutrition effects the genes
2) those genes are heritable
Therefore good/bad nutrition affects the off-spring

"Because then you wouldn’t drop it"
All of the cases of me not dropping it, have been cases where once proven wrong, the retard refuses to admit being proven wrong. **AND IT'S JUST LIKE THAT THIS TIME AROUND AS WELL.**

I sure as fuck am not going to claim myself mistaken when I know I'm in the right and he's in the wrong. Nutrition does not change your genes. Your genes are what they are from the date you were conceived. Mutations are random and not nutritional (unless you eat something carcinogenic/radioactive), and will be independently mutated cell-by-cell. This causes **CANCER** not evolved characteristics.

I'm not giving up on **REALITY** because ETBrooD is scientifically illiterate moron, who still doesn't admit any mistake.

And all you advice is that no-one wants to admit being wrong because I would supposedly never forget their mistakes. And that they instead continue to be wrong, because that's (supposedly) more likely to make me stop mocking them for being idiots.

Who pissed in YOUR Wheaties, Whiic?

Shut up, retard.

If you aren't even going to defend nonsense like "nutrition changes your genome", then just shut up.

And no sensible person would defend such idiocy.

SALT