@whiic

@Monstrous Moonshine Similar levels of denseness experienced, yes.

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

@ETBrooD if they are twins they'll have the same genes, just because one due to social situations starts drinking doesn't mean that his genes have changed from those of their sibling. In the quote you highlighted it doesn't seem to suggest that genes causing a highly likelihood of addiction isn't being caused by alcoholism, but is just common

Although I don't know where from the article you've taken the quote from, so I could just be misinterpreting it

Anyway, I'mma go part-take in the pastime of geniuses

Playing Minecraft

That wasn't what was tested obviously

They tested the effect of drinking on the twins' offspring

Listen this is why people hate talking to you whiic, you argue someone, they fuck up and point and then that’s all it’s about. Everyone that argues you fucks up at one point or another

Hell I don’t even understand why you debate someone other than to try them look dumb

And of course, no one wants to admit their mistakes...*to you*

Because then you wouldn’t drop it

Then “oh so how can you be correct about the heritability of acholoism if you fucked up on FAS?”

Not only that, but I didn't even fuck up, because the argument was two-fold

1) nutrition effects the genes
2) those genes are heritable
Therefore good/bad nutrition affects the off-spring

"Because then you wouldn’t drop it"
All of the cases of me not dropping it, have been cases where once proven wrong, the retard refuses to admit being proven wrong. **AND IT'S JUST LIKE THAT THIS TIME AROUND AS WELL.**

I sure as fuck am not going to claim myself mistaken when I know I'm in the right and he's in the wrong. Nutrition does not change your genes. Your genes are what they are from the date you were conceived. Mutations are random and not nutritional (unless you eat something carcinogenic/radioactive), and will be independently mutated cell-by-cell. This causes **CANCER** not evolved characteristics.

I'm not giving up on **REALITY** because ETBrooD is scientifically illiterate moron, who still doesn't admit any mistake.

And all you advice is that no-one wants to admit being wrong because I would supposedly never forget their mistakes. And that they instead continue to be wrong, because that's (supposedly) more likely to make me stop mocking them for being idiots.

Who pissed in YOUR Wheaties, Whiic?

Shut up, retard.

If you aren't even going to defend nonsense like "nutrition changes your genome", then just shut up.

And no sensible person would defend such idiocy.

SALT

HOLY SHIT

Well no even your genes aren't fixed methylation and de-methylation alters their molecular structure. That's before we get into the really weird shit like transposons.

THIS IS LITTLEBOOTS tier salt

god bless your lolicon heart, Whiic. You made me laugh.

@whiic Though you'll notice how it's obvious that I'm not here to actually argue either point, and that you're getting REALLY fucking angry at me because.....I'm not arguing a point you're arguing against?

do you feel the need to have someone argue against you THAT badly?

Why are you in **DEBATE**?

I was checking on it

and saw something funny

you ARE aware that not every bit of content here has always been debate-related, right?

sometimes people like to react to others arguing in here

And you really don't have anything better to say about the topic?

Ouch. Still angry?

I wouldn't blame ya. I also get angry when people decide to make an observation about somebody who happens to be arguing.

though ya missed a good opportunity for a LB-tier insult

earlier, you COULD have said: "you aren't people, Lore"

I don't care about some insult and meta. Go spam elsewhere already.