You're clearly having trouble with the basics.

So I'm going to lay them back down straight for you

Much appreciated

1. We begin with the assessment that Tolerance and Apathy are perceived falsely as virtuous by a morally perverse and structurally crumbling society.
2. The assessment defines tolerance as a false-virtue pertaining to the tendency for the morally perverse to rationalize and otherwise permit poor behaviors instead of rebuking them and correcting them towards virtuous behaviors. Tolerance as a false-virtue is the absence of objective moral standard, in deference to a nebulous subjectivity.
3. The assessment does not define tolerance as the act of giving due respect to persons.

4. To distinguish between the false-virtue and the act of tolerating, the term "hypertolerance" is suggested as a substitution for the false-virtue.

5. Acceptance is then defined precisely as the active form of hypertolerance - the overt encouragement of behaviors through express approval, rather than tacit, passive permission.

@𝕷𝖊𝖛𝖎𝖆𝖙𝖍𝖆𝖓 Could we agree?

Pretty much

1. If we do (that's what I mean with devil's advocate, for me tolerance of different preferences not overarching NAP is that)

2.yes,if we accepted your premises, it would logically follow, true.

3.yep (same caveat)

4.yep (same caveat)

5.thats some evil, yep I can see @spooky ducc

Accepting point 5 requires accepting point 4, in that case.

Which would imply the caveat is met.

Which means you accept 1.

Oh and thanks for the detailed run down, even if we don't have a good understanding

I try.

Accepting your premises was the seed of my curiosity

k

Is your curiosity sated?

I see where we disagree, there's a few more other branches I suppose.

BUT

Thank you.
Duly

Aye.

So then I suppose we're done here.

Take notes, shitposters.

Cool

More German than I previously thought

Nice, it even included the Finns living all the way up there

Wasn't it common knowledge that most white Americans were German?

<:Veemote:501103628883591188> <:Veemote:501103628883591188> <:Veemote:501103628883591188>
https://gyazo.com/a9a1ab61bd2aed7da4abbde9cb646026

I call your objectivity and I raise you some subjectivity

okay, be part of the problem then.

Non-argument

there's no debate.

Not in your mind.

it's concluded.

In your mind.

...nigger a debate requires more than one party.

You just said there's no debate.

Correct.

I'm not participating.

That's because it only doesn't exist in your mind.

You are the one party that thinks there is a debate ongoing.

Orly