Pretty much

1. If we do (that's what I mean with devil's advocate, for me tolerance of different preferences not overarching NAP is that)

2.yes,if we accepted your premises, it would logically follow, true.

3.yep (same caveat)

4.yep (same caveat)

5.thats some evil, yep I can see @spooky ducc

Accepting point 5 requires accepting point 4, in that case.

Which would imply the caveat is met.

Which means you accept 1.

Oh and thanks for the detailed run down, even if we don't have a good understanding

I try.

Accepting your premises was the seed of my curiosity

k

Is your curiosity sated?

I see where we disagree, there's a few more other branches I suppose.

BUT

Thank you.
Duly

Aye.

So then I suppose we're done here.

Take notes, shitposters.

Cool

More German than I previously thought

Nice, it even included the Finns living all the way up there

Wasn't it common knowledge that most white Americans were German?

<:Veemote:501103628883591188> <:Veemote:501103628883591188> <:Veemote:501103628883591188>
https://gyazo.com/a9a1ab61bd2aed7da4abbde9cb646026

I call your objectivity and I raise you some subjectivity

okay, be part of the problem then.

Non-argument

there's no debate.

Not in your mind.

it's concluded.

In your mind.

...nigger a debate requires more than one party.

You just said there's no debate.

Correct.

I'm not participating.

That's because it only doesn't exist in your mind.

You are the one party that thinks there is a debate ongoing.

Orly

The discussion is concluded. Deal with that, and start another one with someone else.

It's not a debate, it's just contradiction

^

I am the truth bringer, master of knowledge, I am Objective-Man.

Alright so he's shitposting to try and get under my skin.

Cos you're wrong, fool 😄

Ok non-American