Message from @fvriovs
Discord ID: 645955650551021578
@Danacrag such people disgust me
I had a friend that was a cuck
She treated him poorly
I definitely wouldn't rule it out, that there was advanced civ in africa before end of younger dryas
I really, really don't like that shit
If your wife is having sex with other guys she isnt a good wife
I'm skeptical of that @leavethisbotnet.
It's only after the Younger Dryas that agriculture became possible.
Coinciding with the start of the Neolithic.
The flood myths are definitely something that makes me a lot less sceptical
And agriculture has been more or less necessary for advanced civilisation.
@leavethisbotnet of?
My favourite conundrum
Many of the myths do talk about a civilization that was swept away by the (usually) flood
It's no coincidence that major civilisations always emerged around fertile rivers. The Nile, Tigris and Euphrates, whatever the Chinese one is called.
I do like that site Sq.
12,000 years old.
Impressive.
@leavethisbotnet They do, but I wouldn't put too much stock in how the myths assess their own ancestry.
Medieval artists were depicting scenes from the Bronze Age Bible with everyone in medieval armour
The Sumerian King List goes back over 200,000 years.
I'm not convinced these people actually had a concept of pre-civilisation.
So whilst there may have been oral traditions of a flood or higher sea levels.
The actual specifics of how people lived were lost.
Just saying
Most of red sea used to be land before end of Y.D.
sahara did not exist
To my knowledge the Sahara cycles.
Well ok, _in Y.D._ it didn't exist
Agriculture as far as we know has only been enabled for the past 12-11,000 years.
Coinciding to the end of the Y.D
Which itself lasted just over 1,300 years which isn't long when we're talking major scale.
the issue is, there's very little archeological research being done in sahara
or on the seafloor of red sea
I'd imagine both environments would be somewhat difficult to excavate.
Yeah. Which means that the _as far as we know_ is ... limited
In the former you'd need a *lead*, you can't just dig up millions of square kilometres of sand and *hope* you find something no evidence exists for.
In the latter... it's covered by water. And still no leads.