Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 642072756782891028
Russia is just jews and mafia
Spooks have some shitty fuckers in their ranks
you cannot have democracy work just anywhere
Unlike most of his predecessors
Oof.
Should have given the adl their blood money
I see him as ex-KGB only in the sense that has climbed beyond that org on the power ladder. So hes above them and thus not beholden to their whims, but still loyal to them
weakness at the wrong time is a bad idea
Guys. I think my best friend is a colt fag
Take note, I think CIA should be shut down
if that's not clickbait, I'll be surprised
me too; and the FBI
I am not defending them. Nor KGB
the CIA still has more value than say the ATF
American gov doesn't function per design with alphabet agencies
All alphabets soups violate the Constitution so yeah they have to go
Both CIA and FBI seems to be filled with mostly bureaucratic boomers
Yeah, CIA is better at arming the cartels
It was clickbait, he spent the first half talking like a cuck about Pepe and then breaking down into incredulity when getting to the OK symbol
like Daddy Bush
And thats not even getting into H Walker Bush and what his CIA did to this nation
> fuckers... what gives them the right to specify their OWN statute of limitations?
@ManAnimal That's pretty standard, actually. Look through other ToS and they have something to the effect of: "Action must be taken within X years of whatever" and you agree to it when you sign.
Contract is the highest form of manmade law. "To one consenting, no injury is done." ~ Legal Maxim
lol; we think alike @D Two Hands
yes, yes. i know the theory
> "Severance : If it turns out that a particular term of this Agreement is not enforceable for any reason, this will not affect any other terms."
Severance is basically boilerplate. It basically means that if part of this contract fails, it doesn't mean the whole thing fails.
Good to know some people still get it. Most people my age think im talking about Dubya whenever i screetch about Bush
so why can't you do that in say a home improvement contract and why isn't such a clause standard in EVERY contract?
something doesn't add up
So far as I know, you can
if you could do that legally, everyone would do it as a matter of course
Whether you're smart enough to include that is another matter
and i know for a fact they don't
it's not a matter of 'being smart enough'
Short of committing a crime, you can contract to do pretty much anything.
that is what corporate lawyers get paid the big bucks for
again, that doesn't add up
i also know that credit card companies cannot do this either
Ive had those clauses in renters agreements before. It may be a tort thing where you can be disqualified from using such a clause? I know tech in general uses all kinds of legal loopholes to avoid culpability for various user behaviors
in fact, currently, the way credit card companies operate is 'pseudo-legal'