Message from @Mistake
Discord ID: 642072318067081230
I can say that Putin has good effects on Russia, but I would be wary of him
@@Jack of Trades Yup. That's the Great Game. Wont ever stop being played until humans are gone
damn hmm
i'd agree on that
All I need to know of Putin is that he is KGB
tier 3 hammer or tier 3 buzzsaw
And there is no such thing as "ex-KGB"
@Froststep is being the effective word
I think ill do the hammer when I get 1 more DIY or DIE red metal
no such thing as 'ex-CIA' eithter
spook is a spook
Putin is def a bad dude. But he is probably the lesser evil compared to any system that comes about due to his ousting
Just because the name changed doesn't mean anything else did, especially considering the kind of shit we know. Which shouldn't surprise me considering our own CIA
Oh absolutely.
Putin will do what is best for his country
He is calculating, and mostly sane
Russia is just jews and mafia
Spooks have some shitty fuckers in their ranks
you cannot have democracy work just anywhere
Unlike most of his predecessors
Oof.
Should have given the adl their blood money
I see him as ex-KGB only in the sense that has climbed beyond that org on the power ladder. So hes above them and thus not beholden to their whims, but still loyal to them
weakness at the wrong time is a bad idea
Guys. I think my best friend is a colt fag
Take note, I think CIA should be shut down
if that's not clickbait, I'll be surprised
me too; and the FBI
I am not defending them. Nor KGB
the CIA still has more value than say the ATF
American gov doesn't function per design with alphabet agencies
All alphabets soups violate the Constitution so yeah they have to go
Both CIA and FBI seems to be filled with mostly bureaucratic boomers
Yeah, CIA is better at arming the cartels
It was clickbait, he spent the first half talking like a cuck about Pepe and then breaking down into incredulity when getting to the OK symbol
Literal boomers*
like Daddy Bush
And thats not even getting into H Walker Bush and what his CIA did to this nation
> fuckers... what gives them the right to specify their OWN statute of limitations?
@ManAnimal That's pretty standard, actually. Look through other ToS and they have something to the effect of: "Action must be taken within X years of whatever" and you agree to it when you sign.
Contract is the highest form of manmade law. "To one consenting, no injury is done." ~ Legal Maxim
lol; we think alike @D Two Hands