Message from @Jack of Trades

Discord ID: 644333429848277004


2019-11-14 00:26:26 UTC  

it's designed to do so

2019-11-14 00:26:41 UTC  

if it was too ridgid, it wouldn't take the strain over time

2019-11-14 00:26:59 UTC  

Okay, thinf about that MA - you were speaking about the entire jetfuel matter. I do happen to actually understand those differences.

That said the quality of construction is suspect, irrespective of conspiracy.

2019-11-14 00:27:07 UTC  

crushing a pencil end to end is different than snapping it in half

2019-11-14 00:27:31 UTC  

what aspect of the construction is suspect?

2019-11-14 00:28:22 UTC  

and what evidence outside the collapse on 9/11 in which a steel structure suffered complete catastrophic failure suggests such a concern?

2019-11-14 00:28:47 UTC  

Quality of materials as I understand it. Which is why that petition you liked is fair enough.

2019-11-14 00:28:53 UTC  

@Storin I never got a chance to find out the exact claim, but "I tHinK somEOnE mIXeD iN A ChemICAL to MAkE it DisinTeGRAte" is buttfucking retarded.

2019-11-14 00:29:10 UTC  

was there evidence of abnormal construction work? forged safety reports? @Laucivol

2019-11-14 00:29:44 UTC  

Well, it's *New York City*. Corruption is *assumed*.

2019-11-14 00:29:44 UTC  

that claim IS spectulation; HOW the building was brought down is uncertain but a structure doesn't collapse neatly within it's footprint just 'by accident'

2019-11-14 00:30:00 UTC  

gotta admit, it is more likely they skimped on materials or on some ancillary thing that would have prevented catastrophical breakdown

2019-11-14 00:30:09 UTC  

how?

2019-11-14 00:30:19 UTC  

@Zakhan which would show on inspections and repairs, there's nothing

2019-11-14 00:30:23 UTC  

cost-cutting

2019-11-14 00:30:26 UTC  

@Zakhan Not likely, I looked into this pretty heavily for about a decade.

2019-11-14 00:30:37 UTC  

yeah, then we'd have to assume the inspectors and repairmen were in on it, too

2019-11-14 00:30:38 UTC  

you can't design a building to collapse neatly into it's footprint INTENTIONALLY

2019-11-14 00:30:44 UTC  

The purported material requirements, their chemical composition, and their amounts were in line with what was recovered.

2019-11-14 00:30:50 UTC  

and yet @Jack of Trades blocks me over a single topic instead of just moving on. He's lying

2019-11-14 00:31:00 UTC  

And not nearly enough residue to demonstrate "thermite" for example.

2019-11-14 00:31:01 UTC  

say nothing for having a fortunate 1 in a million accident happen

2019-11-14 00:31:04 UTC  

TWICE

2019-11-14 00:31:28 UTC  

here's some cancer for you guys as a friendly reminder, have fun, buhbye

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633966934622208031/644333540145889340/trump_anti.mp4

2019-11-14 00:31:28 UTC  

Mm, like I said - it's suspicious in general.

2019-11-14 00:31:45 UTC  

@Spooky Melon Okay, i'm looking forward to this

2019-11-14 00:31:53 UTC  

trust me, i was aboard a military vessel during the attack

2019-11-14 00:32:06 UTC  

in come the team

2019-11-14 00:32:08 UTC  

for 11 days, i was a civilan aboard an active military vessel

2019-11-14 00:32:15 UTC  

wonder if they'll bring you along with me this time @ManAnimal

2019-11-14 00:32:30 UTC  

i didn't want to accept the evidence either when i first heard someone suggest it

2019-11-14 00:32:31 UTC  

Yeah, that's pretty goddamn retarded and awful. Those poor children.

2019-11-14 00:32:43 UTC  

but them more i looked at the engineeering...

2019-11-14 00:32:48 UTC  

math doesn't lie

2019-11-14 00:32:49 UTC  

The easiest solution is, as I said, workmanship or material quality issues.

2019-11-14 00:32:56 UTC  

no, it isn't

2019-11-14 00:33:04 UTC  

that is an impossibility

2019-11-14 00:33:06 UTC  

*Easiest*.

2019-11-14 00:33:08 UTC  

@Laucivol Or, weakening a giant building from the inside might cause it to fall

2019-11-14 00:33:27 UTC  

You know, because heating metal decreases its modulus of elasticity

2019-11-14 00:33:35 UTC  

Bends a bit, keeps goin