The data says 7, the academic makes the data say 8 because he wants to make his finding seem cooler and more revolutionary than it is, the journalist makes it known the academic and data say 10 because he needs to sell clicks, and the guy listening to the journalist now believes 11 is a valid number because the journalist said it could be up to 11 in order to sell more hype.
Or, in another scenario, the data says 6, an academic says 7, the other academics say the data is racist and bad data, the journalists say there is no data, and yeah
The correct way to arrive at the truth, then, is to ask the wisest person you know, "Who is the wisest person you know?" Then go to that person and ask them the same question, until you arrive at a circle of the wise.
Why does nobody actually do this? Because they're attached to futility and futility tells them pseudo-intellectualism is the same thing as wisdom. If you really wanted to escape this death day dream you would use this technique to find your way out. But you've grown comfortable and persist in sleeping.
"Just going into twitch chat's typing TRUMP 2020
Targeting black people, wiggers
old guys with bald spots
and girls with "common sense"
streams that have rules for no discrimination with others"
