Message from @King Canuck

Discord ID: 645423467864391693


2019-11-17 00:40:22 UTC  

Bureaucrats are the worst

2019-11-17 00:40:43 UTC  

I think we will defo get to bottom of it via discord chat

2019-11-17 00:40:48 UTC  

They r parasites

2019-11-17 00:41:00 UTC  

potential of a total meltdown is a function of reactor design

2019-11-17 00:41:04 UTC  

Oh yeah all of these nuclear scientists in discord will figure it out

2019-11-17 00:41:11 UTC  

😉

2019-11-17 00:41:19 UTC  

at present, reactors aren't desgined to be 'fail-safe'

2019-11-17 00:41:23 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/633966934622208031/645423200859062303/FB_IMG_1573948946853.jpg

2019-11-17 00:41:28 UTC  

they 'fail-catasprophicaly'

2019-11-17 00:41:43 UTC  

@ManAnimal how many disasters since they started building them versus how many are running perfectly fine?

2019-11-17 00:41:53 UTC  

only 4 disasters to date

2019-11-17 00:41:57 UTC  

all of which were predictable

2019-11-17 00:42:01 UTC  

do you realize how many flights happen successfully every single day, but people are terrified to fly because of the handful of plane incidents every year.

2019-11-17 00:42:05 UTC  

3/4 were extremely old

2019-11-17 00:42:06 UTC  

It's the same situation man

2019-11-17 00:42:12 UTC  

'fail-safe' means i can loose power or all the people in the control room and plant and the reactor will settle by itself without power, diesel or anything else into a docile state

2019-11-17 00:42:17 UTC  

Lmao what isn’t predictable

2019-11-17 00:42:21 UTC  

LMAO

2019-11-17 00:42:21 UTC  

All it requires to prevent a nuclear meltdown is regular old maintenance and making sure people are paying attention

2019-11-17 00:42:21 UTC  

Nuclear scientists are always the brightest.. read the story of the Third USA nuke.. to see geniuses killing them selves with a live core.

2019-11-17 00:42:26 UTC  

Same as literally anything else

2019-11-17 00:42:26 UTC  

that is an invalid criteria

2019-11-17 00:42:35 UTC  

@Canadalake the climate <:cz_smirkthonk:350488688771334154>

2019-11-17 00:42:43 UTC  

@ManAnimal why can't you have the control rods require power to maintain themselves in the un-inserted state?

2019-11-17 00:42:45 UTC  

🤡

2019-11-17 00:42:47 UTC  

'how many accidents HAVE happend' is not a valid way to evaluate experience

2019-11-17 00:42:54 UTC  

Text "chat" is prob best form of communication to make problems exponentially more intangible

2019-11-17 00:43:00 UTC  

and if power cuts out

2019-11-17 00:43:04 UTC  

they insert automatically

2019-11-17 00:43:08 UTC  

U think people evaluate shit on a valid basis?

2019-11-17 00:43:11 UTC  

cause the lack of failure is a function of a million different factors

2019-11-17 00:43:19 UTC  

well given enough time, all accidents will happen ?

2019-11-17 00:43:44 UTC  

because maintaining power 1) has a set of pre-requistites and 2) isn't enough

2019-11-17 00:43:50 UTC  

power + control systems

2019-11-17 00:44:11 UTC  

these are two seperate issues

2019-11-17 00:44:50 UTC  

the control system might see the correct state of the plant and issue the proper commands but the actuators may not function correctlly when they receive those commands

2019-11-17 00:45:14 UTC  

or the control system might receive inaccurate info from a failed sensor

2019-11-17 00:45:44 UTC  

or the control system might have a hidden bug that only shows up when the system is excercised in a certain way

2019-11-17 00:46:06 UTC  

We should just use slaves

2019-11-17 00:46:14 UTC  

or the power might be on by not reaching the control system the acctuator or a sensor

2019-11-17 00:46:17 UTC  

etc etc etc