Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 645438362576224257
a lot of wikipedia is sourced
"I'm a source." -Falco, 2019
However it can be noted
There are apparently false claims about Tim pool in his Wikipedia article
wikipedia is good enoug fro a plebe
not for a jounralist or an author
But when he went to go and get it corrected, Wikipedia said no, because Huffington Post was a better source than the man himself
~NEVER a scientist
So they chose Huffington Post fake article over tim himself saying that it's fake
there IS no 'BETTER SOURCE'
only a 'source tree'
damn i hate that notion
if more than one source, include BOTH
don't choose the best
yes if they are a little controversial in left wing circles. there are some srticles edited by fucking lefties
the Gamergate-based articles mainly
(IE. Zoe Quinn, Anita, etc)
most other articles I've seen are fine
Wow. 300 old
the more sources have nuggets incorporated from many perspectives, the stronger the story/report
When 900 old you reach, look as good you will not.
Look at that man
Did you know?
300 man
£old
Are you guys aware of Pamperchu?
o god
Pampering Pikachu?
no
Apparently he's a pedophile
he even admits he is
and that he's a fucking schizo
Well, that wasn't what I was expecting.
I thought it was gonna be a meme when i ask what's pamperchu
it's funny, when i used to reveiew papers, there was always a bibliography a mile long.
I still haven't caught a pikachu in pokemon shield
Urmm
Speaking of pikachus