You have not rebutted that argument

Which is wrong because big cig and big vape are often enough the same companies.

That is not a rebuttal

No it is a mundane statement of reality which runs contrary to your narrative.

It does not

You are presenting as opposed sides entities that are **the same side**.

Wrong

To quote an obstinate opponent of mine;

*you can't take the L and give up when you're wrong*

You're wrong, and it's very obvious why you're wrong

I was talking about market share

The market share of cigs is massive

The market share of vapes is laughably small

Even big tobacco does not care if vape dies

No matter how much they hold

It's nothing, it's a blip

And you're arguing some bullshit

There is no "cigs" company. Now you're just hamster spinning....

Marlboro

Lucky Strike

Marlboro is not a company either.

It's a BRAND you dunce

I was not talking about COMPANIES

Fucking hell

This is just becoming pathetic....

Yeah

Your rebuttal is pathetic

"no U"

International markets tobacco is killing it.

Tobacco is so massive, it can't be killed no matter how much mass genocide it commits

It's a bigger killer than all wars combined

It's on a similar level as sugar

But vaping baaaaaaad

According to how many studies?

Lung cancer studies you mean?

Studies specific to vape

That aren't obvious hit pieces funded by big tobacco

I'm not sure what your question is

The number of studies saying vaping is bad pale in comparison to to the ones that prove beneficial effects

Yeah

That's the whole point

Every single study proves smoking kills