It's nothing, it's a blip

And you're arguing some bullshit

There is no "cigs" company. Now you're just hamster spinning....

Marlboro

Lucky Strike

Marlboro is not a company either.

It's a BRAND you dunce

I was not talking about COMPANIES

Fucking hell

This is just becoming pathetic....

Yeah

Your rebuttal is pathetic

"no U"

International markets tobacco is killing it.

Tobacco is so massive, it can't be killed no matter how much mass genocide it commits

It's a bigger killer than all wars combined

It's on a similar level as sugar

But vaping baaaaaaad

According to how many studies?

Lung cancer studies you mean?

Studies specific to vape

That aren't obvious hit pieces funded by big tobacco

I'm not sure what your question is

The number of studies saying vaping is bad pale in comparison to to the ones that prove beneficial effects

Yeah

That's the whole point

Every single study proves smoking kills

Almost every study proves vaping is pretty much fine

Yet the attack on tobacco is miniscule

Compared to that on vaping

It's completely disproportional

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

There comes the non-rebuttal again

The attack on tobacco is not miniscule compared to vape. The anti-tobacco lobby is a multi-billion dollar industry. It is probably larger than the total vape industry. Which is beside the point as I already stated vape is just another revenue stream as far as big tobacco is concerned.

You didn't ask what I mean by disproportional

You keep making this mistake over and over again

"Hey, ETBrooD, what do you mean by disproportional? Disproportional in what sense?"

Why thank you Jym, I'm glad you asked, let me explain what I mean

*Yet the attack on tobacco is miniscule*

If by "miniscule" you meant "multi-billion dollar industry" I suppose we agree but I would assert you are the one who lacks any understanding of the proportion....

I was talking about the health risk

But since you reacted impulsively