Your argument meat is bad has no basis in science

Thats the bottom line my man

If it worked for you I am glad

that's not a good argument lmfao

But dont stand on a soap box and proclaim to the masses all meat is bad it just makes you look like an idiot

Especially when you don't read your own citations

lol. resorting to ad hominems...

Making you look like an idiot is a descriptor

And coming from the dude who called me a douchebag crying about ad hominems is quite hypocritical

That was a defensive use of douchebag in response to your attacks on me.

You were going at it pretty intensely..

>.>

an ad hominem is when you say, "Your argument is wrong because you're an idiot." not "your argument is wrong and it makes you look like an idiot."

Like when I said you were spouting jargon out of confirmation bias

Which you havent disproven

The former is vested in the latter..

That doesnt make it the same thing

Its not an ad hominem by definition

Douchebag is

No its a descriptor

as you say..

But it isnt

Not in the context you were using it

I didn't say "your argument is invalid because you're a douchebag."

or is that only vested when I throw insults?

hypocrit

hypocrite*

This is the intellectual equivilant of "no u"

now he wants to be intellectual..

If I say you look like your are doing something out of confirmation bias and you call me a douchebag that is an ad hominem

If I say your argument makes you look stupid because of the argument not because of YOU that is not an ad hominem

You attacked my character I did not attack yours

No. It was insulting to imply that I looked that stuff up on the spot and was ignorant about what I was talking about. That was an attack. To which I responded..

I was attacking your argument

You attacked my character

Thats the difference

If you are incapable of understanding that this conversation may as well be over

Although this isnt much of a conversation

plausible denyability

> I feel like you googled that and then just regurgitated it to fulfill your confirmation bias without knowing what any of that actually means or implies

yeah because this isn't being a dick at all.

I attacked your argument