Message from @Tiberius
Discord ID: 629809851211448336
Catching murderers isn't the business of the police?
I don't think giving marriage "meaning" will make responsible people have kids.
Except you cant deprive someone of life
Whether you like it or not an unborn child is a someone
Basic biology states that is a human life
You have to consider why the people we all deem fit to have and raise children aren't doing it. Yes I think some of that has to do with the shit show of marriage but typically those high tier people put off making families because they want to have a certain level of success before they bring a child into the world. That can take time and that breeding strategy doesn't produce many offsprings. The flip side is people who don't care will breed like crazy out breeding those ideal parents who are being responsible.
They are taught to value money over family
I'm not really sure how to fix that though. Maybe offering incentives to successful people to start familiars sooner and have larger ones?
WHich is precisely what no-fault divorce has done
I don't think that's it exactly.
It's taught people that money matters more than family
How on earth has no-fault divorce planted that mindset? If anything it just means removes accountability from marriage. I doubt that has anything to do with why smarter couples on average have fewer children later in life.
See requiring a certain income and mental state would help solve that to some degree
Buuuuut how do you enforce that.
How do you deal with offenders after the fact.
Same way you enforce mandatory vaccines I would suppose
You'd have to sterilize them
Vaccines don't shut people
Some people should be forcibly sterilized
Yeah that sounds a little over reaching. You sound like one of my mates who is always like there should be steralization policy for people of very low IQs
He thinks we should pay low IQ people a lot of money to be steralized. Which I just think is insane
But my machiavellian realist is strangling him atm
I understand the logic but that's crazy.
You have no way of enforcing stuff like that
And it wouldn't be right to do so
Paying people to live who are too dumb to live is not sustainable. You need too big of a government to do that, and to have that big of a government, nobody would have any money so they'd all be under that decree.
And then you could just life and death with anyone you wanted
what do you know communist hellhole
I don't think anyone is saying pay stupid people not to live.
Because you wanted to decide who lives and who dies because you think some people are stupid.
They are saying pay stupid people not to breed
So either dismantle The Great Society, or make it easier to opt out of Welfare.
Which sounds okay in concept but is morally wrong.
But how are the women going to respond to that?
Their biological instinct and purpose is to breed.
Or just get rid of the welfare incentives for pumping welps out of your axe wound
What is a dumb woman with no family going to do with herself?
With this highest value mate. Women want to breed with the highest value mate.
Make Married people with Families and Jobs more applicable for Welfare.
I think they'd steer clear of the sterlized low IQ masses theoretically