No wait she was JP morgan

The Clintons are guilty as fuck... was someone disputing this?

No

What we see is just the tip of the iceberg.
The whole rest of the secrecy happens below the water.
And we only speculate about a small part of that.
The truth is probably a lot bigger than we can even imagine.

The other lady was snapchat CEO

Exactly

There are criminal conspiracies, but it's more simple than people think

it's more like a good old boys club, let my son in this company, don't investigate him or else you are fired etc.

yeah, we're never going to get the *whole* story from what piecemeal documents they deign to feed us under freedom-of-information reqs

it's more of a thuggish way of doing things, politicians who overextend their power to get personal favors done

Complex conspiracies usually don't exist, or if they do it's more like organized crime

There are CIA agents who have been paid off by the cartels for example, so sometimes it's just, to make money

That guy also leaked information for other groups, and who knows where it may have ended up. Jeffery epstein was a big democrat donor, and like Biden's son, avoided prosecution for a long time by getting other people to strong arm on his behalf

The Clinton's also strangely enough, pardonded a lot of human traffickers in the cartels, who epstein was connected to

I mean obviously, who trafficks the most people, right? Cartels and things, especially across our border. It makes sense they were connected

So you have epstein paying people to traffic underage girls for him, who will traffick guns, drugs, workers, anything really, anyone, and then he gets out of jail by strong arming judges politicians etc.

he gets off on a minor charge and little jail time

Then someone connected to the cartels has him killed in prison, since the cartels have thousands of guys in prison

A rich billionare deciding to pay the cartels off, makes a lot of sense. He doesn't need his own criminal conspiracy, he can just pay for an existing one to do things for him. A meeting of thugs and politicians basically. It's simpler than people might imagine

Pay off terrorist group to kill political enemy then pardon them. Or cartels or whoever

Even if you get caught democrats will put their fingers in their ears and not care

They can do no evil as universal healthcare which, by defintion we already have, is so much more important than mass rape and slavery

The democrats in california are a sanctuary state, so mass slavery is legal, as is human trafficking. It's not that hard to find a few democrats that will help facilitate smuggling of people then, for Jeffery Epstein's own sick perversions, if they smuggle millions of illegal immigrants in

Bypassing federal law already

They take advantage of existing criminal conspiracies essentially to get away with stuff

Something like 50-80% of illegal immigrant woman are raped when attempting to cross the border, and it's a well known thing to pimp this people out when they are favorable

Why not tap in to that yourself, right, as a billionare

Blackmail people who sleep with them and make even more money, which he has tons of tapes of

Another thing to look for is who's invested in the stocks. People often look at CEO's, but anyone can profit off of a publicy traded company, who only has stocks in said company for 3 days or less, right. Anyone can buy or sell shares. So, if someone benefits after a major event, it may not have even been the CEO or business leader wanting it, it could be some random shareholder. Commit terrorist attack, stocks go down at said company, then stocks sky rocket when people reverse course and come out in support of said company; you buy low, sell high, no-one the wiser. Hey, I just convienently traded stocks at the right time, nothing illegal about that.

But it leaves behind a clearly trackable paper trail, of only circumstantial evidence, but good enough for a person to figure out who's who

"Timothy M. Carney, US ambassador to Sudan between September 1995 and November 1997, co-authored an op-ed in 2002 claiming that in 1997, Sudan offered to turn over its intelligence on bin Laden to the USA, but that Susan Rice, as National Security Council (NSC) Africa specialist, together with NSC terrorism specialist Richard A. Clarke, successfully lobbied for continuing to bar U.S. officials, including the CIA and FBI, from engaging with the Khartoum government.[8] Similar allegations (that Susan Rice joined others in missing an opportunity to cooperate with Sudan on counter-terrorism) were made by David Rose, Vanity Fair contributing editor,[9] and Richard Miniter, author of Losing Bin Laden"

So Clarke was extremely critical of Bush, and was Clinton's counter terrorism guy. Buttttt, he also did a lot of stuff that obstructed the hunt for Osama bin laden and others

The counter terrorism strategy of Clinton was to do nothing. We did nothing in Rwanda for example, and in 3 months over 1 million people were killed. His general attitude was do nothing, and ignore the problem, and then it got worse

Bush warned of this during his campaign and it made him popular

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_A._Clarke

Oh and the whole 9/11 commission thing in to Bush, it's eerily reminiscent of the Russian spy claims against Trump. With no proof he was formally accused of doing it, and a several year long investigation commenced that has still left many believing it's true

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efforts_to_impeach_George_W._Bush

https://www.dailywire.com/news/flashback-bill-clinton-asked-british-pm-tony-blair-for-help-during-political-season?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro

lol xD

Really there's just so much information to go in to

Ah yes, Tony Blair.