Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 632835523706093579
Does he actually think the national debt means *anything*
Ooga Booga Debt bad
When the entire world is in debt, it doesn't mean a damn thing
"When everyone is Special, No one will be"
-Syndrome, 2004
Always wondered where all the money the government pays in rent actually goes tho...
The US should just default on all it's debt, Easy solution.
Like is it just destroyed, is it payed to the federal reserve, or does the government actually just use it as part of the budget for other things?
A lot of the debt is owned by the federal reserve... But it makes no sense to pay money to the guy who runs the printing press.
Yang has lost his Chinese Privileges
http://dlvr.it/RG4Nhy
OHHHH. Mr Yang has been a very bad commie.
I think he is from Taiwan
So if he gets president that would be hilarious
The Chinese would have to deal with essentially their “joker”
A man who fundamentally dislikes them and has been shoved to the dark with his entire family
While he leads the stronger nation now
The nationalists in China would have the last laugh
Tulsi flip-flopping on her stance on foreign military intervention? Conceptualize my astonishment
is this a flip flop?
Hey can anyone find that video of the UC berkley riots where Antifa attacks people with flag poles. I've been searching on youtube forever and can't find it
Tulsi being in favor of reduced interventionism and then switching that stance to "we should stay and fight their war?" Yeah that's flip-flop
It means she's a virtue signalling snake who doesn't actually have moral principles (this is her second offense on the issue of being unprincipled btw)
tulsi was never anti-interventionist afaik
she's always advocated for fighting islamist terror groups
for example
i think her position was moreso that we shouldn't pursue a policy of regime change
That's exactly my point. Tulsi is a snake, she virtue signals, she's not really anti-interventionism and shit
And now she's been revealed (apparently not for the first time)
i mean has she every claimed to be opposed to foreign intervention outright
she's just stated her opposition to certain kinds of it
also the subtitle to that article is really funny
i might look at it later when i come back
I mean, from what I know she was the "only nationalist left candidate" and she ran on a strong reduction in interventionism
Doesn't mean zero intervention, I mean it's impossible to promise that anyway
So yeah maybe in absolute terms she never stated she's against intervention*ism*
So I'm actually starting to think that the Dems wanted her out of the race not because she was too promising, but because they knew she was too easy to read