That's why we should try to stop all weapons being sold there

Which would have weakened our position

Yes they would. They'd make their own. And those wouldn't be as effective, meaning more civilian casualties. @The Electric Lizard

<a:clapping:597808588286722053>

Try how?

War

That's what it will take

You can welcome back ww2 tactics

Economic? Back a rat into the corner too much and it will bite

War again

IE, carpet bombing

You just caused more casualties, well done @The Electric Lizard

We need more diplomacy in the world, Sit down all the major weapons exporters and try to make them agree to a ban on selling weapons to the middle east

What about the black market?

They'll just buy em from there

They are not as effective as countries

They are.

Countries sell far more weapons that are far more advanced

I'll direct you to the break up of the soviet union

And how many advanced for the time weapons just dispersed

So rather than buying precision munitions, they now buy large bombs and just drop them from helicopters. Causing more casualties. @The Electric Lizard

Syria and their barrel bombs for example.

Causing more civilian casualties, because they don't have access to precision weapons.

Go look at allied bombing during ww2

I get what youre saying lizard. You just are way too idealistic

Ok, What about this then, We stop selling weapons to the Middle East and we just declare war on any nation that starts using weapons that cause unnecessary civilian casualties

When we were TRYING to hit military targets, but *missed*

And hit towns, etc.

Just like the Scots talking about disarming themselves

If they get indyref win

We should just force peace in the Middle East

I don't know how, But we should

So war then

We tried that

I'd rather they fight

Nuke them

That could work

Then send our troops

Someone who doesn't understand the history of the Middle East trying to make it better

Where have I heard this before?

🇺🇸