Because the prorogation was too long

It's literally that simple

that leaflet was what tipped me over into voting out

which goes against our principles, retroactive prosecution is awful

(even if the prosecution isn't a criminal one)

And if anything it was his legal advice

yep

also, this kind of thing is creating support for him

so, short term losses?

maybe aiming for long term power?

I have no fucking idea, I don't think anyone does, it's all a speculation game now

the supreme court together with bercow have thrown out all precedent

When the elites fail to enforce the will of the people

The populists come

And when the populists fail to deliver concrete chnage

The elites come

And thus it cycles

I think the term populist is an oxymoron - wouldn't anyone who wins by popular vote by definition be populist?

Populists are very defined though

You can identify them

Yes it's a shitty label

But yeah

The elitists have failed in the USA and the UK

And now the populists are rocking up

And they are kicking and screaming

Eventually it will turn back

I trust populists more, at least they're brazen in lying

If we mean populist politicians

There is a place for both

But at the end of the day there's little difference because all politicians lie for votes

what's the populists we're talking about then?

When the populists start to not institute and real changes or policies to maintain popularity

can you give me a good definition to work with?

^ asking in good faith, not a trap

So it could be said all politicians are populists

Someone who were to listen to people

that's what I said

Over advisors

Or other countries etc

oh

Populists are usually more nationalist