Nope, it was to make the voices of those left behind heard.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49970267

<:powerful:595334910764515338>

This wouldn't have happened under Rory tbh

'ove our Rory Stewart tbh

Boris should walk away.
Just like he said he would last week

>Parliament

So

brexit was a bunch of whiney grown people

throwing a tantrum

and looking for attention?

Nice to know you admitted it

A massive portion of our people that had been left behind for decades.

Yes.

Their voices ignored, areas decemated thanks to globalization and foreign workers.

THAT's what Brexit was.

Its funny you should say that

>It's going to hurt them more

Yes yes

When the areas that voted most heavily for leave

We know.

had low levels of immigration

>Birmingham

Its almost as if they didn't actually know what they were voting for or why

>Low levels of immigration

<:WaitWhatArmy:590858815189024778>

Yea

one

Yeah, I can tell you they have high levels of immigration mate

I live there

http://theconversation.com/hard-evidence-how-areas-with-low-immigration-voted-mainly-for-brexit-62138

🙂

Might be because lower immigration areas will have had more natives

Which would be less inclined to like the EU

Of course immigrants are gonna support immigration

And I'm talking about those who could vote

Not the ones who couldn't

I mean for example why do you think labour want to opne the borders and allow every resident to vote in a GE?

For support

I can tell you, the differences between the 2011 consensus and 2019 reality are very different @PureEvilPie

You know.
If the referendum result is rejected.
That it shows that 17.4 million votes can be flushed down the toilet on the wishes of the political class.
It destroys any legitimacy in the act of casting a vote if it can just simply be rejected out of hand.