Message from @Nathan James 123

Discord ID: 631520017925799961


2019-10-09 15:53:00 UTC  

The biggest thing i'd do to fuck over your rental portfolio, Joshu, would be to end the practice of paying housing benefit to people in private rented accomodation

2019-10-09 15:53:34 UTC  

so cut social housing supply?

2019-10-09 15:53:45 UTC  

Yes that's what he is saying

2019-10-09 15:53:46 UTC  

couldn't you just juggle your place of residence around multiple homes @Nathan James 123 to avoid this tax?

2019-10-09 15:53:47 UTC  

No, "private rented accodomation" isn't "social housing" supply

2019-10-09 15:53:53 UTC  

Or force councils to pay over the odds

2019-10-09 15:53:58 UTC  

For peoples private houses

2019-10-09 15:54:00 UTC  

To buy them

2019-10-09 15:54:05 UTC  

Build them

2019-10-09 15:54:06 UTC  

This is a tax that the building owner would pay @killerqwerty

2019-10-09 15:54:10 UTC  

Because if I knew there was a huge council demand

2019-10-09 15:54:10 UTC  

Phase it out over time

2019-10-09 15:54:16 UTC  

Damn right I'm holding out for big money

2019-10-09 15:54:17 UTC  

It's to prevent people sitting on empty homes for stupid amounts of time

2019-10-09 15:54:29 UTC  

they already have a lot of social housing tbh

2019-10-09 15:54:49 UTC  

@Nathan James 123 if it's unoccupied, so if I move into it, it's no longer unoccupied.

2019-10-09 15:55:00 UTC  

Problem solved

2019-10-09 15:55:02 UTC  

Someone is using that house

2019-10-09 15:55:03 UTC  

every single development that has occured in the UK over the last decade... 25% of them HAVE to be social housing

2019-10-09 15:55:04 UTC  

Tax payers shouldn't be paying for Rent Seekers investment returns

2019-10-09 15:55:05 UTC  

Which is what we want

2019-10-09 15:55:11 UTC  

Rather than it remaining empty for 10 years

2019-10-09 15:55:20 UTC  

and if I do that with 2 or 3 houses, what is the difference?

2019-10-09 15:55:43 UTC  

to just having 1 or 2 empty houses?

2019-10-09 15:55:55 UTC  

Social Housing needs to be at a price point that is affordable in real-life circumstances

2019-10-09 15:55:59 UTC  

You would be paying the tax, per house.

2019-10-09 15:56:07 UTC  

If you own 6 which are un-used. You pay the tax

2019-10-09 15:56:08 UTC  

It should be the natural competitor to the private rental market

2019-10-09 15:56:17 UTC  

Which increases, the longer it remains empty

2019-10-09 15:56:30 UTC  

its already at something like 25% discount for key workers

2019-10-09 15:57:01 UTC  

"the longer it remains empty" that's the problem, because I'm moving in and out of them an a weakly basis.

2019-10-09 15:57:02 UTC  

Getting all command economy up in here

2019-10-09 15:57:09 UTC  

so it will never trigger

2019-10-09 15:57:16 UTC  

That doesn't matter

2019-10-09 15:57:23 UTC  

The home is being used

2019-10-09 15:57:28 UTC  

Which is the aim of the policy

2019-10-09 15:57:37 UTC  

It's to force people to rent out, or sell their empty home

2019-10-09 15:57:39 UTC  

Such an easy policy to loophole around

2019-10-09 15:57:52 UTC  

Typically gov beaurocractic pointlessness

2019-10-09 15:57:55 UTC  

notice how the warnings of oversupply in london will cause price drops in the city back in 2015 ... and now the london prices are steady/dropping ... theyre blaming brexit 😛

2019-10-09 15:58:16 UTC  

no it's not though, I just list my place of residence as that house for a week, it's still not being used