Message from @Joshu

Discord ID: 632602051024650259


2019-10-12 15:30:53 UTC  

Our, culture and our diplomatic power

2019-10-12 15:30:53 UTC  

rAnK  1  |  sCOrE  100 – Despite its smaller national base, the uK is the most
geopolitically-capable and “well-rounded” of the European major powers. It has a robust
capability portfolio from which to draw in the years ahead, particularly as it navigates
withdrawal from the Eu. In terms of national instruments – in which it leads overall – it has the
largest diplomatic leverage and second-biggest military might (after Russia). It has the largest
military budget in the Eu, while the Royal navy, in terms of total displacement of large warships
and auxiliaries, is larger than the navies of france, Italy and Germany combined. However,
despite its inherent strengths, the uK needs to concentrate on developing a robust strategy in
the years ahead to cultivate and mobilise its overall capability, particularly if it is to realise the
vision of “Global Britain”.

2019-10-12 15:31:31 UTC  

"while the Royal navy, in terms of total displacement of large warships
and auxiliaries, is larger than the navies of france, Italy and Germany combined"

2019-10-12 15:31:34 UTC  

Important one

2019-10-12 15:31:40 UTC  

Global Britain = Empire now

2019-10-12 15:31:41 UTC  

When people start chatting about the RN being shit

2019-10-12 15:31:59 UTC  

yes we need more but it is still very formidable

2019-10-12 15:32:03 UTC  

especially with the new ships

2019-10-12 15:32:09 UTC  

Well in regards to actual combat vessels, it is

2019-10-12 15:32:19 UTC  

Still it's not quite on par with the two power rule we had before, and less relevant given the benefits of Air power.

2019-10-12 15:32:37 UTC  

Type-45's capabilities make al other contemporaries look like wet blankets

2019-10-12 15:33:07 UTC  

You have the Type-45 being able to track and engage 30+ targets at once

2019-10-12 15:33:21 UTC  

while contemporaries are stuck with single digits

2019-10-12 15:33:40 UTC  

It can act as flagship, control air groups

2019-10-12 15:33:47 UTC  

I don't dispute that, but 31 cheap aircraft..

2019-10-12 15:33:53 UTC  

Hypersonic anti-ship weapons

2019-10-12 15:34:01 UTC  

Missile barrages

2019-10-12 15:34:07 UTC  

It can track and engage at LEAST

2019-10-12 15:34:12 UTC  

Ballistic anti-ship missile threats

2019-10-12 15:34:19 UTC  

Fast-attack boat swarms

2019-10-12 15:34:42 UTC  

8 supersonic sea skimming missiles arriving at random intervals, defnding everything within a 6km radius

2019-10-12 15:34:48 UTC  

More than literally any other single ship

2019-10-12 15:35:00 UTC  

That is from it's key specification

2019-10-12 15:35:06 UTC  

as documented by it;s haynes manual

2019-10-12 15:35:16 UTC  

Id like to re-iterate

2019-10-12 15:35:21 UTC  

that's the minimum spec

2019-10-12 15:35:39 UTC  

Missile doctrine especially by China and the Soviet Union (Now Russia) was and still is missile swarms

2019-10-12 15:35:52 UTC  

That's how the Soviets were going to sink the Atlantic carriers

2019-10-12 15:35:55 UTC  

And the ship was designed to defend against exactly that

2019-10-12 15:36:15 UTC  

Yes, but there's a limit to its capabilities, one the enemy will certainly be able to surpass

2019-10-12 15:36:19 UTC  

The sea viper (PAAMS) system was designed specially for integration with other ships

2019-10-12 15:36:25 UTC  

As it would have during the cold war

2019-10-12 15:36:26 UTC  

they can piggy back on it's tracking suit

2019-10-12 15:36:29 UTC  

When attacking carrier groups

2019-10-12 15:36:50 UTC  

*Though, defenses weren't as effective then*

2019-10-12 15:36:56 UTC  

THAT, is the issue with ships in general

2019-10-12 15:37:01 UTC  

Only one needs to get through.

2019-10-12 15:37:12 UTC  

let me once again say, it can track an object the size of a cricket ball moving at mach 3

2019-10-12 15:37:15 UTC  

]200km away

2019-10-12 15:37:32 UTC  

It is a ship designed around a radar

2019-10-12 15:37:38 UTC  

It;s like the A10 of ships